Bug#721498: O: silo -- Sparc Improved LOader
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: Hi Jurij, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: I'll create the git repository on Alioth and push my changes as soon as I've got write permissions to /git/debootloaders/. I approved your membership request, so you should be good to go now. Done: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debootloaders/silo.git;a=shortlog You might want to adjust debian/README.source to reflect the current reality. Upload preferably after I managed to build silo on sparc64, too. If that seems too far away, I'll probably upload earlier. Thanks for picking it up. Thanks for all your work on silo so far! Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- Jurij Smakov | ju...@wooyd.org | Key IDs: 43C30A7D/C99E03CC
Bug#721498: O: silo -- Sparc Improved LOader
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: Control: retitle -1 ITA: silo -- Sparc Improved LOader Control: owner -1 ! Hi Jurij, Jurij Smakov wrote: There are currently no serious bugs that I know of, so it's mostly about keeping it reasonably up to date. Ok, I'll try my luck. I managed to revamp the package in a way that my UltraSparc still boots. ;-) I though couldn't yet play around with silo on sparc64, see my other recent mail to debian-sp...@lists.debian.org. Prospective maintainers should have access to sparc hardware to be able to do at least minimal testing, Given. joining the 'debootloaders' project on Alioth (within which silo was previously maintained) is a good idea as well. Request sent. I'm also already subscribed to the debootloaders-silo mailing list. I though don't intent to continue maintaining the package in svn, but rather switch to git, with the git repository based on the previous svn repository. I'll create the git repository on Alioth and push my changes as soon as I've got write permissions to /git/debootloaders/. I approved your membership request, so you should be good to go now. Thanks for picking it up. Further co-maintainers of course still welcome! :-) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- Jurij Smakov | ju...@wooyd.org | Key IDs: 43C30A7D/C99E03CC
Bug#721498: O: silo -- Sparc Improved LOader
Hi Jurij, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: I'll create the git repository on Alioth and push my changes as soon as I've got write permissions to /git/debootloaders/. I approved your membership request, so you should be good to go now. Done: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debootloaders/silo.git;a=shortlog Upload preferably after I managed to build silo on sparc64, too. If that seems too far away, I'll probably upload earlier. Thanks for picking it up. Thanks for all your work on silo so far! Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721498: O: silo -- Sparc Improved LOader
Control: retitle -1 ITA: silo -- Sparc Improved LOader Control: owner -1 ! Hi Jurij, Jurij Smakov wrote: There are currently no serious bugs that I know of, so it's mostly about keeping it reasonably up to date. Ok, I'll try my luck. I managed to revamp the package in a way that my UltraSparc still boots. ;-) I though couldn't yet play around with silo on sparc64, see my other recent mail to debian-sp...@lists.debian.org. Prospective maintainers should have access to sparc hardware to be able to do at least minimal testing, Given. joining the 'debootloaders' project on Alioth (within which silo was previously maintained) is a good idea as well. Request sent. I'm also already subscribed to the debootloaders-silo mailing list. I though don't intent to continue maintaining the package in svn, but rather switch to git, with the git repository based on the previous svn repository. I'll create the git repository on Alioth and push my changes as soon as I've got write permissions to /git/debootloaders/. Further co-maintainers of course still welcome! :-) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721498: O: silo -- Sparc Improved LOader
Package: wnpp Severity: normal [This message is bcc'd to sub...@bugs.debian.org.] Given that I'm no longer involved with sparc port and none of the other silo maintainers appear to be active (no replies to [0], sent over a month ago), I think the best course of action is to orphan silo. There are currently no serious bugs that I know of, so it's mostly about keeping it reasonably up to date. Prospective maintainers should have access to sparc hardware to be able to do at least minimal testing, joining the 'debootloaders' project on Alioth (within which silo was previously maintained) is a good idea as well. Cheers. [0] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debootloaders-silo/2013-July/84.html
