Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 21:28:42 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I admit this does not clarify the situation for me. Even if the problem is at upstream side - if upstream does not care for the problem the maintainer is in charge to invent a patch. I was just wondering if a binNMU would do the trick or not. If not I have no idea what to do because I do not really understand the problem. This has nothing to do with upstream. This is about the debian binary package name. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
Hi Julien, On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:45:19AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 21:28:42 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I admit this does not clarify the situation for me. Even if the problem is at upstream side - if upstream does not care for the problem the maintainer is in charge to invent a patch. I was just wondering if a binNMU would do the trick or not. If not I have no idea what to do because I do not really understand the problem. This has nothing to do with upstream. This is about the debian binary package name. Well, I now have read three statements: - binNMU - upstream problem caused by old lintian version - wrong package name Please let me know how I can / should solve at least one of the above problems. Patches welcome. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
Hi, I admit I have no idea what you expect me (main Uploader) to do. Please explain and I'll try to be as quick as possible to do so. Kind regards Andreas. On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 05:50:12PM -0300, Felipe Castro wrote: Maybe a problem with the libtool versioning, I had warned the upstream about something similar to it a long time ago... 2013/9/1 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org Am 01.09.2013 19:03, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] and in turn glade-3 Both libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev and libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-dev provide libgtkdatabox-dev, so I think a binNMU should be sufficient. I'm not sure that's going to work. Why is the -dev package versioned anyway? No idea, I'm not the maintainer (CCed) That said, I've asked ftp-masters to do a partial removal and get rid of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev from sid. See #721512, which I marked as blocker for this bug after asking basically the same question on #debian-buildd Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
Sorry, just a guess of mine, not something to packagers deal with. It is maybe something on the source code. See the info about libtool, versioning system. 2013/9/2 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu Hi, I admit I have no idea what you expect me (main Uploader) to do. Please explain and I'll try to be as quick as possible to do so. Kind regards Andreas. On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 05:50:12PM -0300, Felipe Castro wrote: Maybe a problem with the libtool versioning, I had warned the upstream about something similar to it a long time ago... 2013/9/1 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org Am 01.09.2013 19:03, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] and in turn glade-3 Both libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev and libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-dev provide libgtkdatabox-dev, so I think a binNMU should be sufficient. I'm not sure that's going to work. Why is the -dev package versioned anyway? No idea, I'm not the maintainer (CCed) That said, I've asked ftp-masters to do a partial removal and get rid of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev from sid. See #721512, which I marked as blocker for this bug after asking basically the same question on #debian-buildd Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
Hi, I admit this does not clarify the situation for me. Even if the problem is at upstream side - if upstream does not care for the problem the maintainer is in charge to invent a patch. I was just wondering if a binNMU would do the trick or not. If not I have no idea what to do because I do not really understand the problem. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:50:46PM -0300, Felipe Castro wrote: Sorry, just a guess of mine, not something to packagers deal with. It is maybe something on the source code. See the info about libtool, versioning system. 2013/9/2 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu Hi, I admit I have no idea what you expect me (main Uploader) to do. Please explain and I'll try to be as quick as possible to do so. Kind regards Andreas. On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 05:50:12PM -0300, Felipe Castro wrote: Maybe a problem with the libtool versioning, I had warned the upstream about something similar to it a long time ago... 2013/9/1 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org Am 01.09.2013 19:03, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] and in turn glade-3 Both libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev and libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-dev provide libgtkdatabox-dev, so I think a binNMU should be sufficient. I'm not sure that's going to work. Why is the -dev package versioned anyway? No idea, I'm not the maintainer (CCed) That said, I've asked ftp-masters to do a partial removal and get rid of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev from sid. See #721512, which I marked as blocker for this bug after asking basically the same question on #debian-buildd Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- http://fam-tille.de -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] and in turn glade-3 Both libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev and libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-dev provide libgtkdatabox-dev, so I think a binNMU should be sufficient. nmu brp-pacu_2.1.1+git20111020-3 . amd64 . -m Rebuild against libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0 nmu klavaro_1.9.7-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0 Thanks, Michael [1] http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libgtkdatabox -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] and in turn glade-3 Both libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev and libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-dev provide libgtkdatabox-dev, so I think a binNMU should be sufficient. I'm not sure that's going to work. Why is the -dev package versioned anyway? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
Am 01.09.2013 19:03, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] and in turn glade-3 Both libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev and libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-dev provide libgtkdatabox-dev, so I think a binNMU should be sufficient. I'm not sure that's going to work. Why is the -dev package versioned anyway? No idea, I'm not the maintainer (CCed) That said, I've asked ftp-masters to do a partial removal and get rid of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev from sid. See #721512, which I marked as blocker for this bug after asking basically the same question on #debian-buildd Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#721509: nmu: binNMU for libgtkdatabox rdepends
Maybe a problem with the libtool versioning, I had warned the upstream about something similar to it a long time ago... 2013/9/1 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org Am 01.09.2013 19:03, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] and in turn glade-3 Both libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev and libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-dev provide libgtkdatabox-dev, so I think a binNMU should be sufficient. I'm not sure that's going to work. Why is the -dev package versioned anyway? No idea, I'm not the maintainer (CCed) That said, I've asked ftp-masters to do a partial removal and get rid of libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev from sid. See #721512, which I marked as blocker for this bug after asking basically the same question on #debian-buildd Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
