tags 725091 + confirmed
retitle 725091 slapd: memory leak with non-delta syncrepl
thanks
Hi Thomas,
On 22/03/14 11:11 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
FYI; 2.4.39 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago.
I've had another look at the symptoms you reported, using 2.4.39-1.
The good news: the crash
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:39:30PM +0200, Thomas Sesselmann wrote:
Your other option would be to wait until a newer upstream version is
introduced into unstable and then install that, possibly rebuilding it
for wheezy if the library dependencies changed.
This would be the best option for
--On Friday, October 18, 2013 1:39 PM +0200 Thomas Sesselmann
thomas.sesselm...@uni-jena.de wrote:
This would be the best option for us. Did you know when a new
upstream version in unstable or experimental would be released?
Until this we have to try to build our own package at 2.4.36
(the
Hi Ryan,
Am 18.10.2013 07:54, schrieb Ryan Tandy:
...
Quanah is correct that several fixes are needed to 2.4.31 in order to
have working MMR (and probably several more depending on the overlays
you use), and I agree that the fastest way to a working server is
probably to build your own from
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Thomas Sesselmann
thomas.sesselm...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Sounds like ITS#7487
(http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=7487;page=6)
I agree, it does sound like the same bug.
Quanah is correct that several fixes are needed to 2.4.31
Hi Ryan,
Am 11.10.2013 00:44, schrieb Ryan Tandy: Hi Thomas,
Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.
I think the problem is that your slapd.conf uses LDAP Sync replication
and not delta-syncrepl. I missed that at first because you have an
accesslog database configured, so I assumed you
--On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4:30 PM +0200 Thomas Sesselmann
thomas.sesselm...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Ryan,
Am 11.10.2013 00:44, schrieb Ryan Tandy: Hi Thomas,
Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.
I think the problem is that your slapd.conf uses LDAP Sync replication
and not
Hi Thomas,
Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.
I think the problem is that your slapd.conf uses LDAP Sync replication
and not delta-syncrepl. I missed that at first because you have an
accesslog database configured, so I assumed you were using
delta-syncrepl, but your syncrepl consumers
Hi Ryan,
On 02.10.2013 00:52, wrote Ryan Tandy:
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Thomas Sesselmann
thomas.sesselm...@uni-jena.de wrote:
We installed a multimaster replication setup.
Now if we modifies some attributes and groups-memberships and the memory
use of the slapd on the
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Severity: serious
Hello,
we are using Debian 7.1 on amd64.
We installed a multimaster replication setup.
Now if we modifies some attributes and groups-memberships and the memory
use of the slapd on the 'master' increase extremely (10G) until out of memory.
--On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 1:10 PM +0200 Thomas Sesselmann
thomas.sesselm...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Severity: serious
Distribution packages are not meant to be used for production services.
There is even an FAQ about this fact on written by one of the
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Distribution packages are not meant to be used for production
services.
If you don't have any useful responses to this bug (for example, linking
to an ITS where this particular issue has been fixed or discussed), or
want to help fixing or
--On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:12 PM -0700 Don Armstrong
d...@debian.org wrote:
If you don't have any useful responses to this bug (for example, linking
to an ITS where this particular issue has been fixed or discussed), or
want to help fixing or maintaining the openldap packages in Debian,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:20:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:12 PM -0700 Don Armstrong
d...@debian.org wrote:
If you don't have any useful responses to this bug (for example, linking
to an ITS where this particular issue has been fixed or discussed),
--On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:33 PM -0700 Steve Langasek
vor...@debian.org wrote:
Ten years of experience with this package shows me that there is no reason
to expect the new versions upstream recommends to be any less buggy than
the old ones you constantly slag Debian in our own BTS for
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Thomas Sesselmann
thomas.sesselm...@uni-jena.de wrote:
We installed a multimaster replication setup.
Now if we modifies some attributes and groups-memberships and the memory
use of the slapd on the 'master' increase extremely (10G) until out of
16 matches
Mail list logo
