Bug#725757: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze5

2013-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 11:57 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 04:52:54 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Based on another review and your comments above, I'm going to cross my > > fingers, say "please go ahead" and hope everything turns out fine. > > Please bea

Bug#725757: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze5

2013-10-12 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 04:52:54 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Based on another review and your comments above, I'm going to cross my > fingers, say "please go ahead" and hope everything turns out fine. > Please bear in mind that the upload window for 6.0.8 closes this > weekend. Adam, thank you for thorou

Bug#725757: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze5

2013-10-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 13:16 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 05:00:41 you wrote: > > For the record, that all comes to "8 files changed, 6906 insertions(+), > > 5 deletions(-)", which is considerably more than I was expecting, given > > how close we a

Bug#725757: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze5

2013-10-10 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 05:00:41 you wrote: > For the record, that all comes to "8 files changed, 6906 insertions(+), > 5 deletions(-)", which is considerably more than I was expecting, given > how close we are to the update window closing. > > A lot of it appears to be a (possibly over-cautious) belt

Bug#725757: opu: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze5

2013-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 12:13 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I'd like to deliver several security fixes to Zabbix in Squeeze. > > (Security team advised to proceed through OPU "since the oldstable > point update happens very soon anyway and we have many other open > issues with higher priority"). "