Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Josh Triplett wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote:
Software outside of an init system's implementation may not require
a specific init system to be pid 1, although degraded operation is
tolerable.
For instance, consider a
Keith Packard writes (Re: Bug#727708: init system resolution - revised
proposal):
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Ian, Bdale, Andy, Don and Russ agreed on IRC that this was a good
ballot. Steve, Colin, Keith: let us know, and perhaps we can start
the vote sooner.
I
Josh Triplett writes (Bug#727708: init system resolution - revised proposal):
How confident are you that the entire technical committee and the
community of people filing bugs in the future will share your
interpretation of that statement in the resolution,
I'm confident that the policy
Josh Triplett writes (Bug#727708: init system resolution - revised proposal):
A couple of comments inline below.
...
There is an issue with this wording, which I don't think is intended.
Sometimes, the easiest way to maintain support for multiple init systems
involves having a family
To CTTE,
In the wait for your decision next week, many of us assume that you take
into consideration the many misleading and false statements that have
been written about about sysvinit + openrc/insserv.
Additionally, consider this, please:
Adopting systemd (and gnome, dbus-kdbus, wayland, etc
We had a good drafting session on IRC. Here are the results.
I hereby propose (and propose and do not accept amendments as
necessary), so as to provide the following options:
DT systemd default in jessie, requiring specific init is allowed
DL systemd default in jessie, requiring specific
A couple of comments inline below.
Ian Jackson wrote:
== dependencies rider version T (Tight coupling) ==
This decision is limited to selecting a default initsystem; we
continue to welcome contributions of support for all init systems.
Software may require a specific init system
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Josh Triplett wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote:
Software outside of an init system's implementation may not require
a specific init system to be pid 1, although degraded operation is
tolerable.
For instance, consider a gnome-session-systemd package which uses
Hi!
Apologies for jumping into the discussion even though I'm not a Debian
Developer.
== dependencies rider version L (Loose coupling) ==
This decision is limited to selecting a default initsystem; we
continue to welcome contributions of support for all init systems.
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Ian, Bdale, Andy, Don and Russ agreed on IRC that this was a good
ballot. Steve, Colin, Keith: let us know, and perhaps we can start
the vote sooner.
I can vote with this ballot. Sorry I had to disappear in the middle of
the meeting; that
Petr Baudis pa...@ucw.cz writes:
Would such a particular example of (greatly, but not fatally) degraded
operation fall within the intent of this proposal?
I think so, yes.
I do think forcing users who've made a conscious decision to live this
way to click through a warning pop-up on each
11 matches
Mail list logo
