Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-03 Thread Joseph Herlant
Dear Vincent, One last nitpick (sorry!) is that other gnome-shell extensions packaged in Debian seem to prefix their packages with gnome-shell-extension- (e.g. gnome-shell-extension-weather, gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar), so can you please do the same for your binary package as

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-02 Thread Joseph Herlant
Dear Vincent, I first understood that I needed --with quilt and then lintian was complaining about a missing build-dep for quilt. That's why I added them. But I doubled checked, tested on the package and you're right I don't need this! :-) That's great, I removed them. Yep, you guessed why

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-02 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Vincent, I first understood that I needed --with quilt and then lintian was complaining about a missing build-dep for quilt. That's why I added them. But I doubled checked, tested on the package and you're right I

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Vincent, Thanks for this advice. :-) I chose to use the patching approach because I found it cleaner (and wanted to play with quilt once again!). I recreated the package from the upstream 0.8 tag and used quilt to

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-30 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Vincent, Thanks for this advice. :-) I chose to use the patching approach because I found it cleaner (and wanted to play with quilt once again!). I recreated the package from the upstream 0.8 tag and used quilt to integrate the fixes in one patch. Package have been uploaded to mentors. Please

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-29 Thread Joseph Herlant
retitle 728059 RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP] thanks Dear Vincent, Thanks a lot for your advises and your time. Yes, use all instead. any will cause your package to be compiled on all Debian release architectures and introduce different binary packages of gnome-shell-pomodoro for

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-29 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: retitle 728059 RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.8.0-1 [ITP] thanks Dear Vincent, Thanks a lot for your advises and your time. Yes, use all instead. any will cause your package to be compiled on all Debian release

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-27 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Joseph, On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: - Why Architecture: any if there aren't any arch-specific files in your package? As it means any architecture supported by debian and that it is the most frequently used regarding debina policy 5.6.8. I

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-20 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Vincent, Thanks for the quick answer. How is this different from gnome-shell-timer, which is already packaged in debian? The difference is that it uses pomodoro technique. It's not just a timer. For more information about the pomodoro technique, you can begin with the readme of the package

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I repackaged the gnome-shell-pomodoro to support gnome-shell-3.8 (to work with unstable). I am now looking for a sponsor for my package

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Vincent, Thanks for the suggestion for the usage of the Breaks keyword. I personally prefer to do as the gnome-shell-extensions do which is adding gnome-shell (= 3.8), gnome-shell ( 3.9) to the package. I'll update the package accordingly for the next release. For the integration of the

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-01-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Vincent, Thanks for the suggestion for the usage of the Breaks keyword. I personally prefer to do as the gnome-shell-extensions do which is adding gnome-shell (= 3.8), gnome-shell ( 3.9) to

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2013-10-30 Thread Joseph Herlant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I repackaged the gnome-shell-pomodoro to support gnome-shell-3.8 (to work with unstable). I am now looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-shell-pomodoro * Package name: gnome-shell-pomodoro Version : 0.8.0-1