Control: fixed -1 0.86-1
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Package: mtr-tiny
> Version: 0.85-2
> Severity: grave
>
> The newest version refuse to work on IPv4 only nodes.
[...]
> For the records, I have no kernel on production systems that have IPv6
> enabled or
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 04:29:18PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
This seems completely unrelated to mtr or let alone Debian...
If your tunnel is broken, then report that to SixXS, there is a nice
ticket system at https://www.sixxs.net/tickets/. Do provide actual
details instead of making
Note that there are a variety of forums that are a much better place
than a Debian mtr package bug report for these kind of questions.
On 2014-04-28 09:08, Rogier Wolff wrote:
I personally have a good understanding of IPV4 and how I've secured my
network against attacks from outside. I know
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Note that there are a variety of forums that are a much better place
than a Debian mtr package bug report for these kind of questions.
I'm not asking for help. I'm trying to communicate that I think that
disabling IPV6 is a valid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Rogier,
Am Mo den 28. Apr 2014 um 8:08 schrieb Rogier Wolff:
[Problems with IPv6]
Sorry, that I brought my objection against IPv6 into talk. It might be
completely of topic for this bug. Maybe there is a better place to
discuss this.
Just to
On 2014-04-28 10:45, Rogier Wolff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Note that there are a variety of forums that are a much better place
than a Debian mtr package bug report for these kind of questions.
I'm not asking for help. I'm trying to communicate
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:02:50PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
You're saying that masquerading makes my machine wide open?
Bingo. It is no more secure than putting it directly on the network.
See amongst others http://samy.pl/pwnat/
If I run software on a server inside the NAT it can give
On 2014-04-28 13:07, Rogier Wolff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:02:50PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
You're saying that masquerading makes my machine wide open?
Bingo. It is no more secure than putting it directly on the network.
See amongst others http://samy.pl/pwnat/
If I run
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:00:47PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
It is only a user-error from the perspective of disabling a current
protocol. If you disable IPv4 your host won't even boot, even if you
want it to be IPv6 only.
Using IPv6 support of the networking API (getaddrinfo() and
On 2014-04-28 14:26, Rogier Wolff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:00:47PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
It is only a user-error from the perspective of disabling a current
protocol. If you disable IPv4 your host won't even boot, even if you
want it to be IPv6 only.
Using IPv6 support of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Sa den 26. Apr 2014 um 14:59 schrieb Philipp Kern:
~ mtr -4 www.heise.de
My traceroute [v0.85]
ikki (0.0.0.0)
On 2014-04-27 09:04, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
And exactly that is the problem with IPv6. Due the dynamic nature of
IPv6, you might be reachable from the net by accident if you have IPv6
enabled. If you don't use it and don't address it security wise the
same
that you do IPv4, you will be screwed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am So den 27. Apr 2014 um 9:02 schrieb Philipp Kern:
[one problem with automatic IPv6 stuff]
You can also turn off the automatic configuration bits.
True but your forgot the security best practice. And, who ever knows how
to do this!?
Klaus Ethgen wrote:
But serious, I have no way to file a proper patch as I might accidental
break IPv6 stuff as I have no real running IPv6. (My tunnel I have is
broken everytime as init7, that provides it for sixxs, seems to not
expect long running tunnels and breake it from time to time. So
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
The newest version refuse to work on IPv4 only nodes.
~ mtr -4 www.heise.de
My traceroute [v0.85]
ikki (0.0.0.0)
Hi Robert,
Klaus Ethgen wrote:
The newest version refuse to work on IPv4 only nodes.
[...]
Unable to allocate IPv6 socket for nameserver communication: Address
family not supported by protocol
Any news here?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: mtr-tiny
Version: 0.85-2
Severity: grave
The newest version refuse to work on IPv4 only nodes.
~ mtr -4 www.heise.de
My traceroute [v0.85]
ikki (0.0.0.0)
17 matches
Mail list logo
