On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002 Is there any reason to not
publish these debian-private messages?
We don't publish them in order to protect the reputation of people who
are banned. The individuals who are banned can publish their ban if
El dc 15 de 01 de 2014 a les 08:33 -0800, Don Armstrong va escriure:
We don't publish them in order to protect the reputation of people who
are banned. The individuals who are banned can publish their ban if they
wish. [I suppose we could also send ban messages to -project on behalf
of the
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
El dc 15 de 01 de 2014 a les 08:33 -0800, Don Armstrong va escriure:
We don't publish them in order to protect the reputation of people who
are banned. The individuals who are banned can publish their ban if they
wish. [I suppose we could
El dc 15 de 01 de 2014 a les 11:12 -0800, Don Armstrong va escriure:
The message sent to -private is (effectively) the same message sent to
you, which is published here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2014/01/msg00051.html
Steve Langasek claims:
The listmaster who applied the ban
Missatge reenviat
De: Don Armstrong d...@debian.org
Reply-to: listmas...@lists.debian.org
Per a: 735031-d...@bugs.debian.org
Assumpte: Re: Bug#735031: lists.debian.org: arbitrary bans
Data: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:23:58 -0800
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Javier Serrano Polo
5 matches
Mail list logo
