Alex Muntada:
I already asked the upstream author about ignoring fd/0:
https://github.com/jhthorsen/mojolicious-plugin-cgi/issues/6
No response, so far.
The test checks for /proc/$$/fd first, so it will be ignored if
/proc is not available, whatever the system.
I was unable to isolate the
It's been a while since my last package (it was before git) and
i'm trying to update my knowlege about the packaging process.
The problem i'm facing is that there's a test in this Perl
distribution that is behaving differently inside pdebuild with
cowbuilder. As far as i can see from the tests i
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 12:43:17 Alex Muntada wrote:
Does anybody have a clue about where does the fd/0 come from and
how could i improve the test? I'll ask the author if it's safe
to ignore fd/0 in this case. Any other thoughts?
The problem is: '/proc' is not mounted in the pbuilder
Dominique Dumont:
The problem is: '/proc' is not mounted in the pbuilder chroot.
Yes it is in this case, because the test finds those pipes it's
looking for. The problem is that it fins one too many, ie. fd/0.
I already asked the upstream author about ignoring fd/0:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alex Muntada al...@alexm.org
* Package name: libmojolicious-plugin-cgi-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Jan Henning Thorsen jhthor...@cpan.org
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious-Plugin-CGI
* License :
5 matches
Mail list logo
