Gah, I never followed up on this. Patch v2 with minor wording changes
as suggested by Holger...
It would be nice to get this in before release...
diff --git a/debian/cdrom-detect.postinst b/debian/cdrom-detect.postinst
index 3446a06..6bf2454 100755
--- a/debian/cdrom-detect.postinst
+++ b/debian/
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 09:18:49PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>Regarding your unetbootin patch:
>> +Template: cdrom-detect/unetbootin_detected
>> +Type: note
>> +# :sl2:
>> +_Description: UNetbootin media detected
>> + It appears that your installation disk was generated using
>
Hi Steve,
Regarding your unetbootin patch:
> +Template: cdrom-detect/unetbootin_detected
> +Type: note
> +# :sl2:
> +_Description: UNetbootin media detected
> + It appears that your installation disk was generated using
> + UNetbootin. UNetbootin is regul
Control: tag -1 +patch
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:46:20PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>So, some progress on this front. I've filed a bug against unetbootin
>itself to ask for warnings "Don't use this for Debian CD images"
>(#775689) and there has been some discussion there.
>
>I've now tried the
So, some progress on this front. I've filed a bug against unetbootin
itself to ask for warnings "Don't use this for Debian CD images"
(#775689) and there has been some discussion there.
I've now tried the current stable and unstable versions of unetbootin
myself with the latest Jessie d-i RC1 amd6
On Wed 23 Apr 2014 at 15:37:56 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> ACK. I'm going to look into that lot again myself.
Thanks. I may have gone over the top with a few things like reorganising
some things on the page. If I were doing it again today I'd be inclined
to pare it down somewhat.
> In my expe
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 06:42:51PM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
>On Tue 15 Apr 2014 at 16:46:30 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> As suggested in #739767...
>>
>> unetbootin used to be a helpful tool for many people to create
>> USB-bootable installer images, but these days seems responsible for
>>
On Tue 15 Apr 2014 at 16:46:30 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> As suggested in #739767...
>
> unetbootin used to be a helpful tool for many people to create
> USB-bootable installer images, but these days seems responsible for
> lots of user problems and difficult-to-resolve bug reports.
>
> If f
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
As suggested in #739767...
unetbootin used to be a helpful tool for many people to create
USB-bootable installer images, but these days seems responsible for
lots of user problems and difficult-to-resolve bug reports.
If feasible, check to s
9 matches
Mail list logo
