Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-10-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Martin, On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:28:55PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote: Btw. I think you're missing the tag upstream/2.1.4 in order to make git-buildpackage build it without complaints. Yes, I forgot to `git push --tags`, sorry. You can just append a suffix .patch to the URLs of

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-10-09 Thread Martin Steghöfer
El 09/10/14 a les 13:16, Andreas Tille ha escrit: Thanks a lot for your work on this Always a pleasure working with you guys :-) Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-10-08 Thread Martin Steghöfer
Hi Andreas! El 04/10/14 a les 19:41, Andreas Tille ha escrit: In the case of Jellyfish I guess the best thing is to migrate to latest upstream version. That sounds like a good idea in general. It won't solve the clang issue, though. I commited the packaging to Git - however, it needs

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-10-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Martin, On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 06:24:35PM +0200, Martin Steghöfer wrote: El 04/10/14 a les 19:41, Andreas Tille ha escrit: In the case of Jellyfish I guess the best thing is to migrate to latest upstream version. That sounds like a good idea in general. It won't solve the clang issue,

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-10-08 Thread Martin Steghöfer
Hi Andreas! El 08/10/14 a les 21:06, Andreas Tille ha escrit: Would you volunteer to check the current Git repository regarding the clang issue? It's not ready yet but the state is good enough to look into the clang build. The current state of the package in Debian-Med's git repository has

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-10-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Martin, thanks a lot for your QA work. In the case of Jellyfish I guess the best thing is to migrate to latest upstream version. I commited the packaging to Git - however, it needs https://github.com/gmarcais/yaggo which needs to be packaged first. No idea whether we get it to pass new

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-10-03 Thread Martin Steghöfer
Hi all, I can confirm that the build fails with clang 3.4 and that the patch sent by Alexander fixes the problem. The most recent version of clang (3.5), however, compiles the package fine without any patches. This is because Clang has extended its detection of constant values and is now

Bug#749136: jellyfish: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-05-24 Thread Alexander Ovchinnikov
Package: jellyfish Severity: minor Tags: patch User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: clang-ftbfs Hello, Using the rebuild infrastructure, your package fails to build with clang (instead of gcc). See build logs here: