tags 754730 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi intrigeri,
> I think it's preferable to wait until a decision is made for Buster
> wrt. AppArmor though: if we decide to [..]
Indeed, second the enthusiasm! For the time being, I'm going to mark
this as "moreinfo"; it's not the perfect tag but it at least captur
Nicolas Braud-Santoni:
> Lamby, could you confirm whether we only need someone to write the patch?
Thanks for your enthusiasm :)
I think it's preferable to wait until a decision is made for Buster
wrt. AppArmor though: if we decide to ship this LSM enabled by default
via kernel configuration (as
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 04:35:57PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote (12 May 2016 13:21:23 GMT) :
> > Is it really necessary to wait for a policy decision?
>
> I might have over-interpreted Bastien's request for a bug against
> policy:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote (12 May 2016 13:21:23 GMT) :
> What's the status on this?
No progress recently, apart of some recent discussion on #702030,
that this bug is blocking (technically).
> Is it really necessary to wait for a policy decision?
I might have over-interpreted Bastien's request
X-Debbugs-CC: Bastien Roucaries
What's the status on this?
Is it really necessary to wait for a policy decision?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
5 matches
Mail list logo
