On Sun, Oct 5, 2014, at 14:38, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 20:48:31 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
I hope we could leave it as that for the upload - nobody has a time
machine to undo the upload, but we could
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 20:48:31 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
I hope we could leave it as that for the upload - nobody has a time
machine to undo the upload, but we could try to make it better now and
discuss where we should
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
I hope we could leave it as that for the upload - nobody has a time
machine to undo the upload, but we could try to make it better now and
discuss where we should go.
Ok, let's focus on libjpeg-progs, since I do not think there is
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:41:02AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/09/14 11:32, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Bill,
I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the
libjpeg-transition
to you. I have honestly
On 03/10/14 12:14, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:41:02AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/09/14 11:32, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Bill,
I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the
Hi,
looking a bit from the outside it looks to me as different questions
discussed in parallel.
The one question is how we came here.
* Bill Allombert (ballo...@debian.org) [141003 12:15]:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:41:02AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/09/14 11:32, Bill
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 12:37:09PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
seemed like the sensible thing to do, and I didn't see any problem
with the proposed plan. After all, libjpeg62 had been long
deprecated in favor of libjpeg8. Neither of us thought you would
care about libjpeg62 anymore...
On 30/09/14 11:32, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Bill,
I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the
libjpeg-transition
to you. I have honestly believed that you and everyone else involved was
following the transition plan
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Bill,
I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the
libjpeg-transition
to you. I have honestly believed that you and everyone else involved was
following the transition plan as mentioned in #717076#225. As for the
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:32, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:55:16PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Bill,
I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the
libjpeg-transition
to you. I have honestly believed that you and everyone else involved was
Bill,
I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the
libjpeg-transition
to you. I have honestly believed that you and everyone else involved was
following the transition plan as mentioned in #717076#225. As for the
takover
of the libjpeg62* packages it was discussed in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
