Bug#755234: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#755234: Bug#755234: Bug#755234: Bug#755234: a more complete patch for xfce4-power-manager 1.2.0-5, a problem with refreshing of battery status

2014-08-26 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On lun., 2014-08-25 at 14:23 -0700, Eduard Bloch wrote: Let's imagine we would take the 1.3.x version and add it to Sid. Do you consider this possible, anyhow? If no, what are the reasons against it, apart from the convention 1.3 is development and therefore evil. I mean, what's the most

Bug#755234: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#755234: Bug#755234: Bug#755234: Bug#755234: a more complete patch for xfce4-power-manager 1.2.0-5, a problem with refreshing of battery status

2014-08-25 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On lun., 2014-08-25 at 12:30 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: I am well aware how development works, but one has to balance the facts. And as long as there is no real working backport/fix we (Debian) will ship a broken xfpm, which is as bad as shipping a development version (or even worse).

Bug#755234: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#755234: Bug#755234: Bug#755234: Bug#755234: a more complete patch for xfce4-power-manager 1.2.0-5, a problem with refreshing of battery status

2014-08-25 Thread Eduard Bloch
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 09:26:27PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On lun., 2014-08-25 at 12:30 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: I am well aware how development works, but one has to balance the facts. And as long as there is no real working backport/fix we (Debian) will ship a broken xfpm,

Bug#755234: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#755234: Bug#755234: Bug#755234: Bug#755234: a more complete patch for xfce4-power-manager 1.2.0-5, a problem with refreshing of battery status

2014-08-25 Thread Norbert Preining
Yves-Alexis, I don't do waving hands and finger pointing - I tried to help. It was me who checked whether the program runs on sid or not. I have my hands filled with work on TeX/Debian, that is by far enough, sorry. I only wanted to help and suggest, anyway, I leave it to you. But just waving