On 13/08/2014 20:00, Graham Inggs wrote:
Is this correct?
Sorry, I was on vacations without Internet access. I will read all my
mails. You can expect answers and/or new upload for ocl-icd in a
few days.
Regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA
On 11 August 2014 19:44, Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr wrote:
However, in order to ensure a smooth upgrade from stable to
testing, we need in addition 'Replaces' (possibly versionned)
in all new (testing) packages. Conflicts or Breaks are not enough.
I think I understand what you mean
On 09/08/2014 10:21, Graham Inggs wrote:
Considering that by shipping libOpenCL.so, ocl-icd-libopencl1 is the
package breaking policy, and that you indicated libOpenCL.so might
move to the ocl-icd-opencl-dev package, I believe it is simpler for
this bug to be fixed in ocl-icd-libopencl1 alone
On 8 August 2014 19:43, Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr wrote:
For what I remember, both these packages have the libOpenCL.so file
so they are buggy (should declare a conflict directly or indirectly)
libOpenCL.so is shipped by amd-opencl-dev, nvidia-opencl-dev and
ocl-icd-libopencl1.
Hi,
I do not understand this reassign.
On 08/08/2014 17:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 755513 ocl-icd-libopencl1 2.1.0-1
Bug #755513 [nvidia-opencl-dev,ocl-icd-libopencl1] nvidia-opencl-dev: binary
conflict with
5 matches
Mail list logo
