On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Michael Kerrisk mtk.manpa...@gmail.com, 2014-07-31, 12:42:
I've applied the patch below.
Thanks!
+That argument shall be an
+.I int\ *,
+or variant, as specified by the
+.B l
+or
+.B ll
+length modifier.
Hmm.
* Michael Kerrisk mtk.manpa...@gmail.com, 2014-08-01, 08:55:
[[
That argument shall be an
.I int\ *,
or variant whose size matches the (optionally)
supplied integer length modifier.
]]
Looks good to me, thanks!
Now I noticed that in the The length modifier subsection, the n
conversion is
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Michael Kerrisk mtk.manpa...@gmail.com, 2014-08-01, 08:55:
[[
That argument shall be an
.I int\ *,
or variant whose size matches the (optionally)
supplied integer length modifier.
]]
Looks good to me, thanks!
Now I
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 3.65-1
Severity: minor
The only place where flags for the n conversion are mentioned in
description of the 0 flag:
Except for n conversions, ...
This is a bit odd, because the other flags don't make sense for %n
either. In fact, the C99 standard says
tags 756602 fixed-upstream
thanks
Hello Jakub,
I've applied the patch below.
Cheers,
Michael
--- a/man3/printf.3
+++ b/man3/printf.3
@@ -332,9 +332,7 @@ For other conversions, the behavior is undefined.
.B \-
The converted value is to be left adjusted on the field boundary.
(The default is
* Michael Kerrisk mtk.manpa...@gmail.com, 2014-07-31, 12:42:
I've applied the patch below.
Thanks!
+That argument shall be an
+.I int\ *,
+or variant, as specified by the
+.B l
+or
+.B ll
+length modifier.
Hmm. Why only l or ll?
According to the C99 standard, all the length modifiers that
6 matches
Mail list logo