Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

The vocoder plug-in is included upstream of swh-plugins. It should be packaged in a new version of swh-plugins; I have filed https://bugs.debian.org/824211 . Let us wait some days for an answer. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

Here it is the discussion: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/2731 We do not get any compromise about a stable set of standardized plugins. There is no point in sharing the plugins from LMMS, since there is nothing specific to the project. One exception is vocoder, which does not seem to get

Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

While I agree that convenience copies should be avoided, I also believe the upstream authors goal of portability have its virtues too. It is vital for building a community around lmms community that the files created by lmms can be shared by default, and I believe we in Debian do best if we help

Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

Debian has a policy that should be followed about not using conveniece copies of code. There are many packages providing LADSPA plugins that can enhance LMMS. https://packages.debian.org/sid/ladspa-plugin In my humble opinion, the goal should not be to render projects the same in different

Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:51:05 +0200 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Antonio Ospite] > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > lmms provides quite a few LADSPA plugins, what about making them > > available to other programs too? > > Thank you for the idea. I've been wondering about this a bit

Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

[Antonio Ospite] > Hi Petter, > > about the duplication, the proper solution would be to coordinate > with the other Debian maintainers, which can be hard. Well, it would not be that hard, as we can always fall back to just install plugin as -lmms if we are unable to reach the maintainer

Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

Hi, as one of the former main developers of LMMS I'd like to write a few words about LMMS and LADSPA. LMMS ships a bundle of LADSPA plugins in order to provide a standardized set of sound effects. Standardized means, the set is the same on every platform and distribution. When users create

Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

[Antonio Ospite] > Dear Maintainer, > > lmms provides quite a few LADSPA plugins, what about making them > available to other programs too? Thank you for the idea. I've been wondering about this a bit lately, and one idea was to change the lmms build to install the LADSPA plugins in

Bug#758888: lmms: Provide links to LADSPA plugins in /usr/lib/ladspa

Package: lmms Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, lmms provides quite a few LADSPA plugins, what about making them available to other programs too? Other programs look for LADSPA plugins in some standard location like for instance /usr/lib/ladspa, if the plugins provided by