On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:49:50AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
A fair bit of time has passed, we are now quite close to the freeze and
this series adds a new binary package (hence NEW queue etc) so rather
than committing I've pushed to the people/ijc/xen branch. Is it still OK
to go ahead?
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 20:12 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:28:44AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Is there a policy regarding using e.g. people/foo branches in the main
grub.git or shall I go create myself a gitorious repo for WIP stuff?
Given that it's basically me, I
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 15:15 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
I mention this just in case there's a better way of organising this
which might depend on a refinement to the host/guest interface.
We discussed this IRL (nearer to then than now, so I hope I recall the
outcome correctly) and decided that we
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 15:15 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Colin Watson writes (Re: Bug#759018: [PATCH RFC] Provide prebuilt grub-xen
binaries for host (dom0) use):
...
There is also the question of whether the guest-side name should mention
GRUB. One might argue that it shouldn't because all
Colin Watson writes (Re: Bug#759018: [PATCH RFC] Provide prebuilt grub-xen
binaries for host (dom0) use):
...
There is also the question of whether the guest-side name should mention
GRUB. One might argue that it shouldn't because all that matters is
that it uses the Multiboot protocol
On 04/09/14 15:25, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 15:15 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Colin Watson writes (Re: Bug#759018: [PATCH RFC] Provide prebuilt grub-xen
binaries for host (dom0) use):
...
There is also the question of whether the guest-side name should mention
GRUB. One
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 15:38 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
There is no real technical obstacle to prevent PV domains switching
width after starting.
All I know is that when this stuff was first invented lots of people
thought quite hard about this and it is trickier than you might think.
In
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:28:44AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Is there a policy regarding using e.g. people/foo branches in the main
grub.git or shall I go create myself a gitorious repo for WIP stuff?
Given that it's basically me, I haven't really worried about policy, but
I generally think
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 22:46 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 09:38:07PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm attaching a new version with a grub.cfg which is tested and seems to
work. I've also taken the liberty of filing this into a wishlist bug
(keeping entire quoted text
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 09:38:07PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm attaching a new version with a grub.cfg which is tested and seems to
work. I've also taken the liberty of filing this into a wishlist bug
(keeping entire quoted text below for the bug).
This generally looks good to me, thanks!
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 10:42:37PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
The net result of the above is that the dom0 core.img built by the
package will search /boot/grub/{i386,x86_64}-xen/core.elf (for the arch
matching itself only) and then the version without the /boot prefix (for
systems with
On Sat, 2014-08-23 at 21:38 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
(Context for new CC: I'd like to provide a Debian package for dom0 which
includes pvgrub2 binaries which can be referenced from your domain cfg
files as the bootloader/kernel. The associated Debian wishlist bug is
Source: grub2
Severity: wishlist
Version: 2.02~beta2-11
Control: retitle -1 please provide prebuilt grub-xen binaries for host (dom0)
use
I'm attaching a new version with a grub.cfg which is tested and seems to
work. I've also taken the liberty of filing this into a wishlist bug
(keeping entire
13 matches
Mail list logo
