Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2014-08-27 5:47, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On 2014-08-26 6:58, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
The patch looks fine, thanks. Just for a final confirmation, please
could we have a
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
The patch looks fine, thanks. Just for a final confirmation, please
could we have a debdiff of the proposed upload (against the current
stable package); please use 0.90+20120429-1+deb7u1 as the version.
The debdiff is attached. Sorry about the
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2014-08-26 6:58, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
The patch looks fine, thanks. Just for a final confirmation, please
could we have a debdiff of the proposed upload (against the current
stable package); please use
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On 2014-08-26 6:58, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
The patch looks fine, thanks. Just for a final confirmation, please
could we have a debdiff of the proposed upload (against the current
stable package);
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello folks,
The current gnubg in stable segfaults during end game when run with
the -t flag. I got a request from one user to fix this in stable, at:
Hi,
On 2014-08-26 5:30, Russ Allbery wrote:
The current gnubg in stable segfaults during end game when run with
the -t flag. I got a request from one user to fix this in stable, at:
http://bugs.debian.org/754764
Upstream provided the relevant patch, which is quite straightforward
6 matches
Mail list logo
