Bug#761474: please add installation instructions

2014-09-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Package: powerline
Version: 0~20140216-1
Severity: wishlist

Hello Jerome,

so I've installed powerline, but neither is now my command line any different
nor is vim's. What now? So next thing to do is to go to
/usr/share/doc/powerline and see, wheter there's a README.Debian or any
other userful documents helping with installation.

But no, there isn't very much help there either. There's a
README.rst.gz (What's 'rst'? Should that maybe be 'first'?), however
it only refers to online documentation that contains a lot of stuff:
installation via pip, patching fonts et cetera.

So maybe 'man powerline'? No success there either.

Could you please include some user friendly installation documentation? Or
otherwiser maybe refer directly to the relevant documentation
sections in the online docu?

On more question: are you intending to maintain that package? There are
bug reports open against powerline for a few months now that are trivial
to fix, but would improve its quality considerably (#753663, #753665,
#758162). There are ways to get help with a package in Debian (RFH,
orphanig, co-maintaining, letting people know you're interested in NMUs
etc.).

Thanks for packaging and greets,
*t

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages powerline depends on:
ii  fonts-powerline   0~20140216-1
ii  python2.7.3-4+deb7u1
pn  python-powerline  none
pn  python:anynone

powerline recommends no packages.

Versions of packages powerline suggests:
pn  python-powerline-doc  none


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#761474: please add installation instructions

2014-09-14 Thread Jerome Charaoui
Hi Tomas,

 Could you please include some user friendly installation documentation? Or
 otherwiser maybe refer directly to the relevant documentation
 sections in the online docu?

Agreed.


 On more question: are you intending to maintain that package? There are
 bug reports open against powerline for a few months now that are trivial
 to fix, but would improve its quality considerably (#753663, #753665,
 #758162). There are ways to get help with a package in Debian (RFH,
 orphanig, co-maintaining, letting people know you're interested in NMUs
 etc.).

To be honest these fixes have been sitting in my source tree, however I
was simultaneously working on packaging a new upstream version but as
the Powerline has seen intense development these last few weeks and thus
changed considerably, I had some difficulty and the whole thing fell
through.

In any case, thanks for the heads up. I'll push a new package revision
and keep my efforts to package a new upstream version seperate.


-- Jerome



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#761474: please add installation instructions

2014-09-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek

Hi Jerome!

On Sun, 14 Sep 2014, Jerome Charaoui wrote:


Could you please include some user friendly installation documentation? Or
otherwiser maybe refer directly to the relevant documentation
sections in the online docu?


Agreed.



On more question: are you intending to maintain that package? There are
bug reports open against powerline for a few months now that are trivial
to fix, but would improve its quality considerably (#753663, #753665,
#758162). There are ways to get help with a package in Debian (RFH,
orphanig, co-maintaining, letting people know you're interested in NMUs
etc.).


To be honest these fixes have been sitting in my source tree, however I
was simultaneously working on packaging a new upstream version but as
the Powerline has seen intense development these last few weeks and thus
changed considerably, I had some difficulty and the whole thing fell
through.

In any case, thanks for the heads up. I'll push a new package revision
and keep my efforts to package a new upstream version seperate.


Oh, this is taking me by surprise. I was under the evidently wrong 
impression, that you weren't much active with your package any more. Ha! 
Nice you're not!


Best greets and thanks!
*t


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org