Hi again,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote (22 Oct 2014 08:48:23 GMT) :
> On 22/10/14 10:14, intrigeri wrote:
>> Should I NMU again with this new patch applied?
> Yes.
Done. Attached updated `svn diff`, that combines both NMUs.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Index: debian/changelog
On 22/10/14 10:14, intrigeri wrote:
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 1.42.0-2.1
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738989
Hi,
I'm very sorry, I had improperly tested that the upstream commit I've
cherry-picked in my NMU was enough to fix the problem for
libg
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 1.42.0-2.1
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738989
Hi,
I'm very sorry, I had improperly tested that the upstream commit I've
cherry-picked in my NMU was enough to fix the problem for
libglib-object-introspection-perl... and i
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote (21 Oct 2014 18:36:04 GMT) :
> Please go for it. No need to go through the deferred queue.
Thanks, done. I'm attaching the `svn diff' output from the tree where
I have run svn-buildpackage, so that you can easily import it into the
packaging SVN repository.
Cheer
On 21/10/14 12:19, intrigeri wrote:
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (16 Oct 2014 09:29:56 GMT) :
this seems to be https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737275,
that was apparently fixed upstream in
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gobject-introspection/commit/?id=578eebd54bd9f2b16
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (16 Oct 2014 09:29:56 GMT) :
> this seems to be https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737275,
> that was apparently fixed upstream in
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gobject-introspection/commit/?id=578eebd54bd9f2b1677922680701c454f489c895
> It's o
6 matches
Mail list logo
