On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:32:04PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:50:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 02:30:02PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > >
Hi all,
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:50:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 02:30:02PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best
> > > solution
Hi Julien,
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 07:09:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 16:46:12 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I tend to agree that we shouldn't propagate an ancient unsupported
branch
of torque into Jesse. Also, I really wish we were having this discussion
a few
months ago, not the day(!) before freeze starts.
But, I *strongly* disagree that we should
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Dominique Belhachemi domi...@debian.org
wrote:
I agree that the 2.4 branch is completely outdated. We should switch to a
newer branch.
The 2.5 and 4.1 branches are not suitable for Debian due to licensing
issues.
But the 4.2 branch is licensed under the
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
pbs-drmaa as reverse dependency of torque is easy as it is a leaf
package. The more complicated one would be openmpi which would need to
drop the
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 16:46:12 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
pbs-drmaa as reverse dependency of torque is easy as it is a leaf
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best
solution would be to remove torque completely for jessie (i.e. first
drop support from openmpi to be able to remove the package and
remaining reverse dependencies).
4
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 02:30:02PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best
solution would be to remove torque completely for jessie (i.e. first
drop support from openmpi to be
Hello,
Von: Dominique Belhachemi domi...@debian.org
I agree that the 2.4 branch is completely outdated. We should switch to a
newer branch.
The 2.5 and 4.1 branches are not suitable for Debian due to licensing issues.
But the 4.2 branch is licensed under the same license as the 2.4 branch, so
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
pbs-drmaa as reverse dependency of torque is easy as it is a leaf
package. The more complicated one would be openmpi which would need to
drop the build dependency on libtorque2-dev. The reason for this
dependency was in
Source: torque
Severity: serious
Justification: end-of-life branch from upstream, low maintenance in Debian
Hi
I discussed this with Moritz Muehlenhoff, but bringing this now up to
discussion. Note that debian-release@l.d.o and the openmpi and
pbs-drmaa maintainers are X-Debbugs-CC'ed on this
I agree that the 2.4 branch is completely outdated. We should switch to a
newer branch.
The 2.5 and 4.1 branches are not suitable for Debian due to licensing
issues.
But the 4.2 branch is licensed under the same license as the 2.4 branch, so
I suggest we upload the 4.2.9 release to unstable.
13 matches
Mail list logo
