Bug#774449: sensible-utils: please make sensible-utils build reproducibly

2017-06-28 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Hi, here is an updated patch - it gets rid of filesystem and umask > differences, which started cropping up. I think previously I was testing with > an older version of reprotest, which didn't properly test these differences. > > I also took the chance to refactor the rules file sli

Bug#774449: sensible-utils: please make sensible-utils build reproducibly

2017-05-09 Thread Ximin Luo
Hi, here is an updated patch - it gets rid of filesystem and umask differences, which started cropping up. I think previously I was testing with an older version of reprotest, which didn't properly test these differences. I also took the chance to refactor the rules file slightly, for readabilit

Bug#774449: sensible-utils: please make sensible-utils build reproducibly

2016-11-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
It would be great if this was fixed. The sensible-utils package is one of the packages used by FreedomBox, and it is useful if all the packages used on the FreedomBox were reproducable. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen

Bug#774449: sensible-utils: please make sensible-utils build reproducibly

2016-09-16 Thread Ximin Luo
Package: src:sensible-utils Followup-For: Bug #774449 Dear Maintainer, Hello, any news on this? It's been a year since the patch was filed; I can confirm that it still works to make the package build reproducibly. I'd be happy to do a delayed NMU for this package, if you're busy - I notice tha

Bug#774449: sensible-utils: please make sensible-utils build reproducibly

2015-01-02 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Source: sensible-utils Version: 0.0.9 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bu...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that sensible-utils could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch addresses