On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:54:48AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Keith Edmunds wrote:
I didn't expect it to list a conflict with spamassassin twice, nor did I
expect it to conflict with itself.
There are actually valid situations for both, the later is e.g.
explicitly allowed by debian-policy
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.11-1+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I wanted to check what packages 'spamc' would pull in.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Control: retitle -1 aptitude: Package conflicts are reported incorrectly
(without architecture) if foreign architectures are enabled
Hi,
Keith Edmunds wrote:
I ran aptitude show spamc
* What was the outcome of this action?
This (partial) output:
$
3 matches
Mail list logo
