Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

2016-03-31 18:52 GMT+01:00 Nikos Tsipinakis : > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: >> Uhm, sorry for not being clear. I know that the Debian maintainers >> were busy with other stuff. >> >> What it was not clear to me was why this

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Uhm, sorry for not being clear. I know that the Debian maintainers > were busy with other stuff. > > What it was not clear to me was why this was present in both 2.8 *and* > 2.9 upstream, e.g., if the original patch

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

2016-03-31 17:35 GMT+01:00 Nikos Tsipinakis : > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 04:10:06PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: >> Was it left out for some particular reason? >> >> I have quite a lot of memory so this is not critical for me in any way >> (but thanks for taking

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 04:10:06PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Was it left out for some particular reason? > > I have quite a lot of memory so this is not critical for me in any way > (but thanks for taking care of this). But I imagine that many of the > users of newsbeuter can

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

2016-03-31 14:54 GMT+01:00 Nikos Tsipinakis : > Hello, > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:12:35PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: >> It seems that 2.9 still uses a lot of memory (at least in my >> use-case), 800MB right now after being restarted a few hours ago. >> >>

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

Hello, On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:12:35PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > It seems that 2.9 still uses a lot of memory (at least in my > use-case), 800MB right now after being restarted a few hours ago. > > So re-opening this bug. Apparently the patch for the memory leak didn't

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 newsbeuter/2.9-2 Hi Nikos, 2016-01-03 11:30 GMT+00:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo : > It would be very nice to get this fixed, it's getting up to 800+MB of > mem within hours, it seems to stabilise a bit after that. > > Version

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

Control: tags -1 + patch Hi all, 2015-02-01 18:25 Nico Golde: Hi, * Mark Nipper [2015-02-01 19:06]: It seems there is a rather nasty memory leak in 2.8 of newsbeuter. The bug for it is mentioned here (with a pretty graph!): ---

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

Hi, > On 03 Jan 2016, at 12:30, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + patch > > > Hi all, > > 2015-02-01 18:25 Nico Golde: >> Hi, >> * Mark Nipper [2015-02-01 19:06]: >>>It seems there is a rather nasty memory leak

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream 2016-01-03 13:35 GMT+00:00 Nico Golde : >> On 03 Jan 2016, at 12:30, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo >> wrote: >> >> It would be very nice to get this fixed, it's getting up to 800+MB of >> mem within hours, it seems to

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

Hi, * Mark Nipper ni...@bitgnome.net [2015-02-01 19:06]: It seems there is a rather nasty memory leak in 2.8 of newsbeuter. The bug for it is mentioned here (with a pretty graph!): --- https://github.com/akrennmair/newsbeuter/issues/119 This has caused a smaller virtual host I have

Bug#776728: newsbeuter: nasty memory leak in 2.8

Package: newsbeuter Version: 2.8-2 Severity: important It seems there is a rather nasty memory leak in 2.8 of newsbeuter. The bug for it is mentioned here (with a pretty graph!): --- https://github.com/akrennmair/newsbeuter/issues/119 This has caused a smaller virtual host I have