On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:53:06 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:insighttoolkit4
> Version: 4.6.0-3
>
> insighttoolkit is only built on amd64 and i386, while insighttoolkit3 worked
on
> some more architectures.
True. It became untenable to support other architectures and that hasn't
On 03/25/2015 08:28 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:27:02PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 14:53 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:insighttoolkit4
Version: 4.6.0-3
insighttoolkit is only built on amd64 and i386, while insighttoolkit3
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:27:02PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 14:53 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:insighttoolkit4
Version: 4.6.0-3
insighttoolkit is only built on amd64 and i386, while insighttoolkit3
worked on
some more architectures. any
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:34:24AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
I personally creating packages with tests switch of because we know the
tests will fail for certain architectures does not make any sense. We
do not provide packages to fill in gaps in our package x architecture
matrix
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 14:53 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:insighttoolkit4
Version: 4.6.0-3
insighttoolkit is only built on amd64 and i386, while insighttoolkit3 worked
on
some more architectures. any reason for not trying to build that? Sure, it
needs 50g - 100g disk for the
Package: src:insighttoolkit4
Version: 4.6.0-3
insighttoolkit is only built on amd64 and i386, while insighttoolkit3 worked on
some more architectures. any reason for not trying to build that? Sure, it
needs 50g - 100g disk for the build, a 500mb log file, and such. given the
alternative to
6 matches
Mail list logo
