On 2016-05-04 05:10:30, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:10:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>
>> > Sorry to jump the thread here, but what *is* mole.watch? I can't find
>> > it on search engines or the debian wiki...
>>
>>
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:10:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
> > Sorry to jump the thread here, but what *is* mole.watch? I can't find
> > it on search engines or the debian wiki...
>
> mole was a udd-ish thing written by jvw,
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Sorry to jump the thread here, but what *is* mole.watch? I can't find
> it on search engines or the debian wiki...
mole was a udd-ish thing written by jvw, unfortunately he hasn't been
around for a long time and few other people worked on
Package: qa.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #782677
Sorry to jump the thread here, but what *is* mole.watch? I can't find
it on search engines or the debian wiki...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:30:48AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 29/06/15 at 16:47 +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +, Bart Martens wrote:
It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which
On 30/06/15 at 17:47 +, Bart Martens wrote:
How different is mole's data schema from UDD's?
I guess you already have access to UDD's data schema. Can you access
mole.watch
with what you read in udd-dehs?
It seems that udd-dehs doesn't keep track of both unstable and
experimental. Some
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:15:49PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 30/06/15 at 17:47 +, Bart Martens wrote:
How different is mole's data schema from UDD's?
I guess you already have access to UDD's data schema. Can you access
mole.watch
with what you read in udd-dehs?
It seems
On 29/06/15 at 16:47 +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +, Bart Martens wrote:
It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch.
So I
don't know why
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +, Bart Martens wrote:
It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So
I
don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would even run uscan.
Because the UDD
It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So I
don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would even run uscan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +, Bart Martens wrote:
It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So I
don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would even run uscan.
Because the UDD implementation predates a working mole.watch. DEHS died,
then there was nothing
For the record, if we want uscan results in udd, then I suggest getting them
from mole.watch where they are being kept up to date, and including sepwatch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi,
The update-upstream-status script for UDD does not appear to consider
sepwatch.
sepwatch is a subversion repository which contains seperate watch files
submitted by those that are not maintainers
13 matches
Mail list logo
