On 21 April 2015 at 13:56, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
On 21 April 2015 at 09:57, Pierre Chifflier pol...@debian.org wrote:
Arturo: I thought the plan was to keep the current situation, and remove
libhtp from Debian ?
Yes,
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Hilko Bengen wrote:
* Raphaël Hertzog:
But libhtp is already packaged separately. Embedded copy are best
avoided and to me it looks like #777040 got fixed the wrong way.
libhtp should be fixed to have a saner SONAME and/or it should
generate a strict dependency
On 21 April 2015 at 09:57, Pierre Chifflier pol...@debian.org wrote:
Arturo: I thought the plan was to keep the current situation, and remove
libhtp from Debian ?
Yes, that was the plan so far.
--
Arturo Borrero González
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 08:39:16AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Hilko Bengen wrote:
* Raphaël Hertzog:
But libhtp is already packaged separately. Embedded copy are best
avoided and to me it looks like #777040 got fixed the wrong way.
libhtp should be
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
On 21 April 2015 at 09:57, Pierre Chifflier pol...@debian.org wrote:
Arturo: I thought the plan was to keep the current situation, and remove
libhtp from Debian ?
Yes, that was the plan so far.
I guess that's acceptable as long as there
* Raphaël Hertzog:
But libhtp is already packaged separately. Embedded copy are best
avoided and to me it looks like #777040 got fixed the wrong way.
libhtp should be fixed to have a saner SONAME and/or it should
generate a strict dependency through its shlibs/symbols files.
Is it your goal
Package: suricata
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: important
Looking at https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/suricata/filelist
you will see this:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhtp-0.5.17.so.1
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhtp-0.5.17.so.1.0.0
But libhtp is already packaged separately. Embedded copy are
7 matches
Mail list logo