Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
On 2015-05-09 12:49, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On jeu., 2015-05-07 at 10:15 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On mer., 2015-05-06 at 10:56 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed On 04/05/15 13:34, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: we'd like to upload Xfce 4.12 to unstable. It currently sits in experimental since few weeks, and seems to work just fine. Go ahead. I've uploaded Xfce 4.12 and did a bunch of sourceful uploads for various plugins. I'll track the buildd status and fix any issue arising. Then we'll be able to schedule the binNMUs for the remaining packages. Seems that stuff built just fine on most arches (sparc still has some need-built packages though). I guess we can start scheduling the binNMUs. Excellent, thanks. Scheduling... -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
On jeu., 2015-05-07 at 10:15 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On mer., 2015-05-06 at 10:56 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed On 04/05/15 13:34, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: we'd like to upload Xfce 4.12 to unstable. It currently sits in experimental since few weeks, and seems to work just fine. Go ahead. I've uploaded Xfce 4.12 and did a bunch of sourceful uploads for various plugins. I'll track the buildd status and fix any issue arising. Then we'll be able to schedule the binNMUs for the remaining packages. Seems that stuff built just fine on most arches (sparc still has some need-built packages though). I guess we can start scheduling the binNMUs. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
On mer., 2015-05-06 at 10:56 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed On 04/05/15 13:34, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: we'd like to upload Xfce 4.12 to unstable. It currently sits in experimental since few weeks, and seems to work just fine. Go ahead. I've uploaded Xfce 4.12 and did a bunch of sourceful uploads for various plugins. I'll track the buildd status and fix any issue arising. Then we'll be able to schedule the binNMUs for the remaining packages. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 04/05/15 13:34, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: we'd like to upload Xfce 4.12 to unstable. It currently sits in experimental since few weeks, and seems to work just fine. Go ahead. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784239: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#784239: Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
On lun., 2015-05-04 at 16:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On lun., 2015-05-04 at 15:34 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: One thing which might break (I'll test and report back) is libxfcegui4, which is an old/deprecated Xfce library (replaced by libxfce4ui), which is still in the archive because not everything has been ported to libxfce4ui. So it does break but the good news is that a oneliner fix is already in Ubuntu, and I'll upload it (and only it) to unstable right away. I just uploaded the fix to unstable, so it won't FTBFS once libxfce4util 4.12 goes to unstable. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, we'd like to upload Xfce 4.12 to unstable. It currently sits in experimental since few weeks, and seems to work just fine. There's a soname transition (libxfce4util6 to libxfce4util7) so it'll need some binNMUs, and as always the xfce4-panel plugins need to be rebuilt against the new panel to get the correct dependencies/conflicts. This time plugins built against xfce4-panel 4.10 should work with xfce4-panel 4.12, but we don't know about the future so we keep the shlibs like this for now. The ben file generated by reportbug was wrong because the xfce4-panel package is not renamed and we need to check the version, so I edited it manually following the Xfce 4.10 ben file but it might still be wrong. Thanks in advance and congrats for the Jessie release! Ben file: title = xfce 4.12; is_affected = .depends ~ libxfce4util6 | .build-depends ~ xfce4-panel-dev | .depends ~ libxfce4util7; is_good = .depends ~ libxfce4util7 | .depends ~ xfce4-panel ( 4.11); is_bad = .depends ~ libxfce4util6 | .depends ~ xfce4-panel (= 4.11); -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (450, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.0.1 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
On 04/05/15 13:34, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, we'd like to upload Xfce 4.12 to unstable. It currently sits in experimental since few weeks, and seems to work just fine. There's a soname transition (libxfce4util6 to libxfce4util7) so it'll need some binNMUs, and as always the xfce4-panel plugins need to be rebuilt against the new panel to get the correct dependencies/conflicts. This time plugins built against xfce4-panel 4.10 should work with xfce4-panel 4.12, but we don't know about the future so we keep the shlibs like this for now. The ben file generated by reportbug was wrong because the xfce4-panel package is not renamed and we need to check the version, so I edited it manually following the Xfce 4.10 ben file but it might still be wrong. Thanks in advance and congrats for the Jessie release! Ben file: title = xfce 4.12; is_affected = .depends ~ libxfce4util6 | .build-depends ~ xfce4-panel-dev | .depends ~ libxfce4util7; is_good = .depends ~ libxfce4util7 | .depends ~ xfce4-panel ( 4.11); is_bad = .depends ~ libxfce4util6 | .depends ~ xfce4-panel (= 4.11); The xfce4-panel tests seem inverted. Have you done test rebuilds for the libxfce4util rdeps? Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
On lun., 2015-05-04 at 15:24 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: The xfce4-panel tests seem inverted. Yes, sorry (I'm glad I actually put a warning sign :) Have you done test rebuilds for the libxfce4util rdeps? The “core” Xfce stack in experimental is built against libxfce4util7, yes. I didn't build all the panel plugins but I don't expect much breakage here. One thing which might break (I'll test and report back) is libxfcegui4, which is an old/deprecated Xfce library (replaced by libxfce4ui), which is still in the archive because not everything has been ported to libxfce4ui. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#784239: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#784239: transition: xfce 4.12
On lun., 2015-05-04 at 15:34 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: One thing which might break (I'll test and report back) is libxfcegui4, which is an old/deprecated Xfce library (replaced by libxfce4ui), which is still in the archive because not everything has been ported to libxfce4ui. So it does break but the good news is that a oneliner fix is already in Ubuntu, and I'll upload it (and only it) to unstable right away. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
