Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On 2015-11-25 20:34, Julien Aubin wrote: > Do you have any news ? Is release 0.7.1 of glx-alternative-nvidia stable > enough now ? The packages were sitting in the queue for a few days and got just accepted into jessie-backports, so the full updated nvidia stack should be available in

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hello Andreas, Do you have any news ? Is release 0.7.1 of glx-alternative-nvidia stable enough now ? This is because actually installing nvidia-driver package for owners of GeForce 9xx is a bit painful (although nothing impossible). Thanks 2015-11-07 14:04 GMT+01:00 Andreas Beckmann

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Thanks a lot ! 2015-11-26 2:39 GMT+01:00 Andreas Beckmann : > On 2015-11-25 20:34, Julien Aubin wrote: > > Do you have any news ? Is release 0.7.1 of glx-alternative-nvidia stable > > enough now ? > > The packages were sitting in the queue for a few days and got just > accepted

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On 2015-11-06 19:43, Julien Aubin wrote: > Now that glx-alternative* 0.6.93 are in testing repos, would it be possible > to push them to backports repo ? Once 0.7.x is there and everything has stabilized in stretch I plan to backport the whole nvidia stack (most of the dependencies are already in

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hello, Now that glx-alternative* 0.6.93 are in testing repos, would it be possible to push them to backports repo ? Thanks a lot ! Julien. 2015-10-24 9:01 GMT+02:00 Luca Boccassi : > On Oct 23, 2015 21:27, "Julien Aubin" wrote: > > > > Very

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On Oct 23, 2015 21:27, "Julien Aubin" wrote: > > Very great news, many thanks ! :-) > > And yes it would be great to see the 355 series in backports. I've heard that the packaging for it would be different due to new NVidia infrastructure. And also I need to point out that

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On 2015-10-23 18:08, Julien Aubin wrote: > Hi, > > I've found a bug in your new packaging. > > In your release notes you state that you removed package > nvidia-kernel-common but actually nvidia-kernel-support stills depend on it. > https://packages.debian.org/experimental/nvidia-kernel-support

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Maybe I didn't understand correctly : nvidia-graphics-drivers (340.93-6) unstable; urgency=medium * nvidia-opencl-icd: Restore the Depends: libcuda1. * d/rules: Move tar option --no-recursion before the list of files. * Bump dependency to nvidia-kernel-common (>= 20151021) which no longer

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

My bad, actually this is another package to backport as it breaks otherwise the 352.55 driver. (The problem is for newcomers who own a Maxwell GPU and cannot anymore install the 352.41 driver which worked well) Thanks anyway. 2015-10-23 20:21 GMT+02:00 Julien Aubin : >

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hi, I've found a bug in your new packaging. In your release notes you state that you removed package nvidia-kernel-common but actually nvidia-kernel-support stills depend on it. https://packages.debian.org/experimental/nvidia-kernel-support Changes are there :

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Very great news, many thanks ! :-) And yes it would be great to see the 355 series in backports. I've heard that the packaging for it would be different due to new NVidia infrastructure. And also I need to point out that the 358 series is coming very soon (beta releases are already out) so it may

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On 2015-10-23 20:23, Julien Aubin wrote: > My bad, actually this is another package to backport as it breaks otherwise > the 352.55 driver. (The problem is for newcomers who own a Maxwell GPU and > cannot anymore install the 352.41 driver which worked well) Once everything has stabilized again in

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Tried to install glx-alternative-nvidia from unstable but it also requires glx-diversiosn at the same version. Did not go any further. 2015-10-18 0:23 GMT+02:00 Julien Aubin : > Hi, > > The problem is that until now you guaranteed that NVidia drivers could be >

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

OK found the workaround for now : Run : cd /tmp wget http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/g/glx-alternatives/glx-alternative-mesa_0.6.91_amd64.deb wget http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/g/glx-alternatives/glx-alternative-nvidia_0.6.91_amd64.deb wget

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

No problem I've pushed a WA in the bug report. If you could put it in the wiki. I never managed to create an account on it Le 18 oct. 2015 14:23, "Luca Boccassi" a écrit : > On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 00:23 +0200, Julien Aubin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > The problem is that

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

We'll also need to update glx-alternative-fglrx 2015-10-18 11:39 GMT+02:00 Julien Aubin : > OK found the workaround for now : > > Run : > cd /tmp > wget > http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/g/glx-alternatives/glx-alternative-mesa_0.6.91_amd64.deb > wget >

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 00:23 +0200, Julien Aubin wrote: > Hi, > > > The problem is that until now you guaranteed that NVidia drivers could > be installed for Maxwell GPU owners using your experimental repo, and > now this is no longer the case. > > > Cf. documentation : >

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Do you also have the nasty bug ID ? I could try to reproduce it (and maybe give a clue about some fix...) 2015-10-18 14:30 GMT+02:00 Julien Aubin : > No problem I've pushed a WA in the bug report. If you could put it in the > wiki. I never managed to create an account on

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hi, The problem is that until now you guaranteed that NVidia drivers could be installed for Maxwell GPU owners using your experimental repo, and now this is no longer the case. Cf. documentation : https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers I perfectly understand your point but this is a

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On 2015-10-17 23:48, Julien Aubin wrote: > Hello, > > I saw that you updated the NVidia driver, thanks for this. The problem is > that it cannot be installed on Jessie because of a conflict towards > glx-alternatives-nvidia. > > Could you please upload the right versions to backports repo ? > >

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hello, I saw that you updated the NVidia driver, thanks for this. The problem is that it cannot be installed on Jessie because of a conflict towards glx-alternatives-nvidia. Could you please upload the right versions to backports repo ? xserver-xorg-video-nvidia : Casse: glx-alternative-nvidia

Bug#787582: Info received (Bug#787582: VDPAU needed)

OK got it, many thanks for everything, you're all great ! 2015-08-03 20:38 GMT+02:00 Julien Aubin julien.au...@gmail.com: Hi, No problem, actually I thought it was simply a miss. Thanks ! :-) 2015-08-03 18:45 GMT+02:00 Luca Boccassi luca.bocca...@gmail.com: On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 18:36

Bug#787582: Info received (Bug#787582: VDPAU needed)

Hi, No problem, actually I thought it was simply a miss. Thanks ! :-) 2015-08-03 18:45 GMT+02:00 Luca Boccassi luca.bocca...@gmail.com: On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 18:36 +0200, Julien Aubin wrote: Hello, Actually things won't work until we also have the i386 flavour of libvdpau1 :-(

Bug#787582: Info received (Bug#787582: VDPAU needed)

Hello, Actually things won't work until we also have the i386 flavour of libvdpau1 :-( Thanks a lot and sorry again. 2015-08-01 18:00 GMT+02:00 Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org : Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is

Bug#787582: Info received (Bug#787582: VDPAU needed)

On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 18:36 +0200, Julien Aubin wrote: Hello, Actually things won't work until we also have the i386 flavour of libvdpau1 :-( Hello, Please be patient, the build elves are working as hard as they can! :-) All the supported architectures will pop up soon in the

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Ok many thanks for the link Le 1 août 2015 17:43, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org a écrit : On 2015-08-01 00:21, Julien Aubin wrote: Package still not appearing in backports. Was it rejected ? :-( Please be patient. https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html Andreas

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On 2015-08-01 00:21, Julien Aubin wrote: Package still not appearing in backports. Was it rejected ? :-( Please be patient. https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hi Vincent, Package still not appearing in backports. Was it rejected ? :-( Thanks 2015-07-27 18:57 GMT+02:00 Julien Aubin julien.au...@gmail.com: Many thanks Vincent, waiting for the approval. :-) 2015-07-26 22:52 GMT+02:00 Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org: Hi Julien, On Sun, Jul 26,

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Many thanks Vincent, waiting for the approval. :-) 2015-07-26 22:52 GMT+02:00 Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org: Hi Julien, On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Julien Aubin julien.au...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:14:01 -0700 Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: Hi Julien,

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:14:01 -0700 Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: Hi Julien, On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Julien Aubin jul.au...@laposte.net wrote: Hi, In that case could you please also put the libvdpau1 and libvdpau1:i386 packages in experimental ? No, because AFAIK

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hi, In that case could you please also put the libvdpau1 and libvdpau1:i386 packages in experimental ? They're actually required to install nvidia-driver 352 and the only way we currently have to install these updates is to pin these packages from testing. (And actually we'd need them in

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hi Julien, On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Julien Aubin jul.au...@laposte.net wrote: Hi, In that case could you please also put the libvdpau1 and libvdpau1:i386 packages in experimental ? No, because AFAIK packages in experimental can't share the same version as a package already uploaded

Bug#787582: VDPAU needed

Hi Julien, On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Julien Aubin julien.au...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:14:01 -0700 Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: Hi Julien, On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Julien Aubin jul.au...@laposte.net wrote: Hi, In that case could you please