Bug#788418: Now resuming the packaging
Hi Gianfranco, Always a pleasure to have you as my reviewer for this package. I will fix your comments during the week. I will also take this opportunity to apply a few of the improvement you suggested on other reviews. So more work is needed, such as: - *not* to use a custom symlink for jquery on doxygen generated HTML docs, - split -arch and -indep targets, this package fits this requirement very nicely, - apply stricter hardening. Most of which I have already completed. Could you expand on the comment wrt the transition slot? This is something I am not familiar with. Many thanks, Ghis
Bug#788418: Now resuming the packaging
Hi, you should open a bug against release.debian.org https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=release.debian@packages.debian.org;tag=transition and ask for a transition slot test if the reverse dependencies still build fine https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-nfft.html (maybe you have some other dependencies, please look at apt-cache rdepends library reverse-depends -b src:package outputs) cheers, G. Il Martedì 13 Ottobre 2015 9:42, Ghislain Vaillantha scritto: Hi Gianfranco, Always a pleasure to have you as my reviewer for this package. I will fix your comments during the week. I will also take this opportunity to apply a few of the improvement you suggested on other reviews. So more work is needed, such as: - *not* to use a custom symlink for jquery on doxygen generated HTML docs, - split -arch and -indep targets, this package fits this requirement very nicely, - apply stricter hardening. Most of which I have already completed. Could you expand on the comment wrt the transition slot? This is something I am not familiar with. Many thanks, Ghis
Bug#788418: Now resuming the packaging
On 13/10/15 10:33, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:57:27AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, you should open a bug against release.debian.org https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=release.debian@packages.debian.org;tag=transition and ask for a transition slot test if the reverse dependencies still build fine https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-nfft.html (maybe you have some other dependencies, please look at apt-cache rdepends library reverse-depends -b src:package outputs) More at https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions According to Mattia's link, I should be in step 1 of the recommended workflow: "Upload your new version to experimental (and have it clear NEW)" Requesting a transition slot happens way further the line it seems, or am I missing something? Ghis
Bug#788418: Now resuming the packaging
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:57:27AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > you should open a bug against release.debian.org > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=release.debian@packages.debian.org;tag=transition > > and ask for a transition slot > > test if the reverse dependencies still build fine > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-nfft.html > (maybe you have some other dependencies, please look at > apt-cache rdepends library > reverse-depends -b src:package > outputs) More at https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#788418: Now resuming the packaging
Hi Ghislain, >"Upload your new version to experimental (and have it clear NEW)" > >Requesting a transition slot happens way further the line it seems, or >am I missing something? yes, you set target experimental, clear new queue and ask the slot. cheers, G.