Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >>> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. >

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >>> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. >>> >>> James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in >>>

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > >> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 16/11/15 20:08, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > FTR, we're now

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 16/11/15 20:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 16/11/15 21:59, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 16/11/15 20:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 16/11/15 20:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. >> >> James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in >> #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 08.11.2015 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix yet). zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but the delta is

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. > > James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in > #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix > yet). > > zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice. James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix yet). zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but the delta is too large for me to backport it as part of an NMU.

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 25/10/15 16:08, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [151023 00:03]: >> Thanks, and no rush. Just wanted to make sure this didn't fall under the >> cracks. > > Yeah, super sorry that this took so long. > > Here are my results, rgd. the packages still

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [151023 00:03]: > Thanks, and no rush. Just wanted to make sure this didn't fall under the > cracks. Yeah, super sorry that this took so long. Here are my results, rgd. the packages still listed on the ruby2.2 transition tracker (all on amd64): Fail:

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 30/09/15 19:18, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 19/09/15 15:27, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:17:38PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 28/07/15 23:23, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Hello release team. We are not at a point where it makes sense to

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:40:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > the remaining packages are ruby libraries who are either not ported or > have build problems, and it is OK to have them removed from testing for > now. > > Please let me know if it's OK to go forward

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 22/10/15 22:33, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:40:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> the remaining packages are ruby libraries who are either not ported or >> have build problems, and it is OK to have them removed from testing for >> now. >>

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 19/09/15 15:27, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:17:38PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 28/07/15 23:23, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> Hello release team. >>> >>> We are not at a point where it makes sense to switch the default ruby >>> in unstable. I have been

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:17:38PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 28/07/15 23:23, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Hello release team. > > > > We are not at a point where it makes sense to switch the default ruby > > in unstable. I have been running it on my work machine for a few weeks > >

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 07:28:14PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 06:23:57PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Hello release team. We are not at a point where it makes sense to switch the default ruby now? -^ yes in unstable. […] These packages FTBFS and we

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On 28/07/15 23:23, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Hello release team. We are not at a point where it makes sense to switch the default ruby in unstable. I have been running it on my work machine for a few weeks and didn't notice any problems worth postponing this any longer. After that is done,

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 06:23:57PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Hello release team. We are not at a point where it makes sense to switch the default ruby now? -^ in unstable. […] These packages FTBFS and we will need to look at them individually: korundum kross-interpreters

Bug#789077: ruby2.2 transition: about to switch the default in unstable

Hello release team. We are not at a point where it makes sense to switch the default ruby in unstable. I have been running it on my work machine for a few weeks and didn't notice any problems worth postponing this any longer. After that is done, the following packages will need to be binNMUed: