On 2015-10-25 23:29, Michael Biebl wrote:
> btw, I don't see why this particular bug i RC? Unowned files by itself
> are not a reason for RC bugs.
The problem I see is leaving around broken SONAME symlinks in
/usr/lib/ upon removal of one of these -dev packages.
These could break things.
Am 26.10.2015 um 10:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> On 2015-10-25 23:29, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> btw, I don't see why this particular bug i RC? Unowned files by itself
>> are not a reason for RC bugs.
>
> The problem I see is leaving around broken SONAME symlinks in
> /usr/lib/ upon removal of one
Control: reassign -1 libjson0-dev
Am 26.10.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 26.10.2015 um 10:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
>> On 2015-10-25 23:29, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> btw, I don't see why this particular bug i RC? Unowned files by itself
>>> are not a reason for RC bugs.
>>
>> The
On 2015-10-25 21:25 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:40:16 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
>> Patch attached.
>>
>> It's probably ok to ask for a jessie-ignore tag unless you can show that
>> this dangling link causes an actual problem.
>
> The patch looks
Am 25.10.2015 um 23:27 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 25.10.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Sven Joachim:
>> On 2015-10-25 21:25 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:40:16 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>>
Patch attached.
It's probably ok to ask for a
Am 25.10.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Sven Joachim:
> On 2015-10-25 21:25 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:40:16 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>
>>> Patch attached.
>>>
>>> It's probably ok to ask for a jessie-ignore tag unless you can show that
>>> this
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:40:16 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libjson-c-dev
> Version: 0.11-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package causes creation of
>
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:40:16 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Patch attached.
>
> It's probably ok to ask for a jessie-ignore tag unless you can show that
> this dangling link causes an actual problem.
The patch looks incorrect to me, btw.
The *.so.* files belong into /lib, the
8 matches
Mail list logo