Hi!
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 10:36:33 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
On 07/22/15 15:19, Guillem Jover wrote:
If dpkg is unreliable, then what are the package signatures good for?
I'm not sure which package signatures you're talking about. But, no, this
is very old “expected” behavior, it's
Hi Guillem,
On 07/22/15 15:19, Guillem Jover wrote:
If dpkg is unreliable, then what are the package signatures good for?
I'm not sure which package signatures you're talking about. But, no, this
is very old “expected” behavior, it's documented both in the dpkg FAQ:
I can assure you that
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.16
gcc-multilib (4:4.7.2-1, amd64) provides a symbolic link for
/usr/include/asm
# dpkg --contents /var/cache/apt/archives/gcc-multilib_4%3a4.7.2-1_amd64.deb
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-09-27 02:02 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2012-09-27 02:02 ./usr/
Control: forcemerge 406715 -1
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi!
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 09:27:14 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.16
gcc-multilib (4:4.7.2-1, amd64) provides a symbolic link for
/usr/include/asm
On some Wheezy hosts in my net /usr/include/asm is a
4 matches
Mail list logo
