Hi again Simon,
I wonder whether you noticed this report. The issue keeps htseq out of
Debian and as far as I can see it might be a non-issue. The difference
between the Expected and the actual result does not look critical to me
at all and I wonder whether it is just a matter of adjusting the
comparison a bit. If you confirm that my suspicion is correct I could
volunteer to take over this but your confirmation would be really
helpful here.
Thanks
Andreas.
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:26:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I guess/hope you know that the Debian Med team (namely Diane Trout)
> packaged htslib for the Debian distribution. Recently we upgraded to
> the latest version (0.6.1p1) which caused some trouble with one test
> (out of 37) for 32 bit architectures. The issue is reported as Debian
> bug #797793. For instance here is one build log of i386:
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=htseq=i386=0.6.1p1-1=1439721264
>
> with the critical part of
>
> python2.7 test/test.py
> Doctest of tss.rst:
> **
> File "../doc/tss.rst", line 114, in tss.rst
> Failed example:
> wincvg
> Expected:
> array([0, 0, 0, ..., 0, 0, 0], dtype=int32)
> Got:
> array([0, 0, 0, ..., 0, 0, 0])
> **
> 1 items had failures:
>1 of 37 in tss.rst
> ***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
> 1 of 37 tests failed.
>
>
> Could you please give some hint how to deal with this?
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
> ___
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
