Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

2015-10-25 Thread Jörn Schönyan
On Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2015 17:03:45 CEST, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, You realized that these files aren't symlinks but libraries? So really don't think this would be correct. One example: So I guess you should create the library and symlink the so file? (I mean, a library and a

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

2015-10-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >What exactly? I mean dh_build, dh_clean, dh_install and so on :) >I would like to avoid that, mainly because the work would be obsolete soon, >as upstream wants to switch to CMake in the (more or less) near future. ack then >You realized that these files aren't symlinks but

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

2015-10-05 Thread Jörn Schönyan
Hi, again sorry for the delay. - please switch the rules file to debhelper calls :) What exactly? -"install -m 644 debian/shlibs debian/panda3d1.9.0/DEBIAN/shlibs" Fixed. all the DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH (I guess, didn't try) might be fixed by patching the makepanda/makepanda.py file

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

2015-09-18 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, wonderful! In the meanwhile: rules: - please switch the rules file to debhelper calls :) -"install -m 644 debian/shlibs debian/panda3d1.9.0/DEBIAN/shlibs" this seems wrong maybe rename the file in libpanda3d1.9.0.shlibs, but it should be picked up automagically. all the

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

2015-09-16 Thread Jörn Schönyan
Hi everyone, sorry for the delay, I'm quite busy on real-life work. I've uploaded a new version, I've decided to switch to shlibs instead of a symbols file as I think it's unrealistic to maintain 32k lines of symbols for several architectures and the documentation states, that the shlibs