Bug#798255: erlang-cl: installs non-free packages

2015-09-07 Thread Stepan Golosunov
Package: erlang-cl Version: 1.2.1-2 Severity: important Installation of erlang-cl pulls in non-free fglrx and nvidia packages: % apt -s install erlang-cl NOTE: This is only a simulation! apt-get needs root privileges for real execution. Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,

Bug#798255: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#798255: erlang-cl: installs non-free packages

2015-09-07 Thread Sergei Golovan
tags 798255 + moreinfo thanks Hi Stepan! On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Stepan Golosunov wrote: > > Installation of erlang-cl pulls in non-free fglrx and nvidia packages: Well, if you'll look into the erlang-cl dependencies in the source file, you'll find the

Bug#798255: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#798255: erlang-cl: installs non-free packages

2015-09-07 Thread Stepan Golosunov
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 03:19:27PM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote: > tags 798255 + moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Stepan! > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Stepan Golosunov > wrote: > > > > Installation of erlang-cl pulls in non-free fglrx and

Bug#798255: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#798255: erlang-cl: installs non-free packages

2015-09-07 Thread Sergei Golovan
severity 798255 normal thanks Hi Stepan, On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Stepan Golosunov wrote: > > Looks like this is caused by > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739409 > which is supposed to be fixed in ocl-icd-libopencl1 2.1.3-5 > while erlang-cl

Bug#798255: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#798255: erlang-cl: installs non-free packages

2015-09-07 Thread Stepan Golosunov
07.09.2015 в 20:10:31 +0300 Sergei Golovan написал: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Stepan Golosunov > wrote: > >> On the other hand, you have the non-free repository enables, so why do > >> you expect APT > >> not to install packages available from there? If you don't

Bug#798255: [Pkg-erlang-devel] Bug#798255: Bug#798255: erlang-cl: installs non-free packages

2015-09-07 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Stepan, On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Stepan Golosunov wrote: > > Presence of non-free component in sources.list does not void social > contract. And any case when installation of a package from main > results in installation of a package from non-free (or contrib) >