Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-09 09:20:51)
> On 09/08/2015 10:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-08 09:28:15)
>>> On 09/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the
> fonts-android package, then
On 09/08/2015 10:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-08 09:28:15)
>> On 09/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the
fonts-android package, then good.
>>>
>>> I think the better approach is to keep
Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-08 09:28:15)
> On 09/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the
>>> fonts-android package, then good.
>>
>> I think the better approach is to keep the fonts-roboto package, have
>> your package exclude
On 09/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the
>> fonts-android package, then good.
>
> I think the better approach is to keep the fonts-roboto package, have
> your package exclude fonts, depend on the fonts-roboto package, and
>
Thomas Goirand writes:
> On 09/08/2015 05:33 AM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> Yeah, we already have couple of webfonts under pkg-fonts team, though
>> there is no strict policy yet we place them under /usr/share/fonts/type
>> where type can be ttf, otf, woff, svg eot, etc. And
Hi Thomas,
Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-07 19:53:16)
> On 09/07/2015 07:00 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> We already have a fonts-roboto which is part of fonts-android
>> source. ยน. There was a discussion on pkg-fonts-devel IIRC previously to
>> split roboto fonts to its own package as code was
6 matches
Mail list logo