Bug#799656: [JsSIP] Re: Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

On 28/09/15 18:18, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2015-09-24 15:14 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : >> Can anybody from the JsSIP team comment on this? How do you feel about >> having node-nan 2.x in the dependency hierarchy? Will you continue >> using node-websocket or would you

Bug#799656: [JsSIP] Re: Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

Daniel Pocock writes: > c) maybe we could split the package to have a browser-only version that > doesn't need any of this compiled code? That would be less painful to > support. good idea. -- juha

Bug#799656: [JsSIP] Re: Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

2015-09-30 13:48 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : > c) maybe we could split the package to have a browser-only version that > doesn't need any of this compiled code? That would be less painful to > support. d) Just take the dist/jssip.js browser-only version and use just that file

Bug#799656: [JsSIP] Re: Bug#799656: NaN 2.x issue

2015-09-24 15:14 GMT+02:00 Daniel Pocock : > Can anybody from the JsSIP team comment on this? How do you feel about > having node-nan 2.x in the dependency hierarchy? Will you continue > using node-websocket or would you possibly use node-ws[1] instead? > Using node-ws instead