Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

2015-10-24 0:15 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson : >> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo >> writes: > > MAFM> The idea is that you install libgdal1i from testing first > MAFM> (1.11.2+dfsg-3), then install qgis also from testing (with all of

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

2015-10-25 1:11 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson : >> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo >> writes: > > MAFM> stable and testing are supposed to be free of that (althought the big > MAFM> gcc-5/C++11 ABI transition affected testing as well,

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo > writes: MAFM> sid is subject to massive changes and in-place library updates. This MAFM> can result in a very unstable system which contains packages that MAFM> cannot be installed due to missing libraries,

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo > writes: MAFM> stable and testing are supposed to be free of that (althought the big MAFM> gcc-5/C++11 ABI transition affected testing as well, I think). MAFM> unstable and experimental are not, because it is where

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

2015-10-25 1:52 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson : >> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo >> writes: > > MAFM> sid is subject to massive changes and in-place library updates. This > MAFM> can result in a very unstable system which contains

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo > writes: MAFM> The idea is that you install libgdal1i from testing first MAFM> (1.11.2+dfsg-3), then install qgis also from testing (with all of the MAFM> versions of the dependency chain from testing). Which maybe

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

2015-10-23 4:05 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson : > Nope. No go. > > # aptitude install qgis > The following NEW packages will be installed: > libgsl0ldbl{a} (D: qgis) (qgis D: libgsl0ldbl) qgis{b} (D: > libgdal.so.1-1.11.2) > The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

Nope. No go. # aptitude install qgis The following NEW packages will be installed: libgsl0ldbl{a} (D: qgis) (qgis D: libgsl0ldbl) qgis{b} (D: libgdal.so.1-1.11.2) The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed: qgis-plugin-globe (R: qgis) The following packages are

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

2015-10-08 13:30 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson : > reopen 799918 > found 799918 0.7.3-1 > thanks > > OK now full-upgrade prints "- libgdal1i, but 1.11.3+dfsg-1~exp1 is to be > installed." twice! On the same line too. > (Note I always use the CLI aptitude and never curses.) > >

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

reopen 799918 found 799918 0.7.3-1 thanks OK now full-upgrade prints "- libgdal1i, but 1.11.3+dfsg-1~exp1 is to be installed." twice! On the same line too. (Note I always use the CLI aptitude and never curses.) qgis : Depends: libgdal.so.1-1.11.2 which is a virtual package, provided by:

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

Hi again, Axel Beckert wrote: > 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > > Subject: Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent Depends. ;-) > > # apt-get install qgis > > Some packages could not be installed. > > Well, for me that means, it's no bug in aptitude either, just broken > packages in Debian Unstable

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

Hi, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > Subject: Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent > > # apt-get install qgis > Some packages could not be installed. Well, for me that means, it's no bug in aptitude either, just broken packages in Debian Unstable as it may happen from time to time. IMHO we can

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

Manuel, can we first attack why even apt or apt-get fails? # apt update Ign:1 http://dl.google.com/linux/earth/deb stable InRelease Hit:2 http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian experimental InRelease Hit:3 http://dl.google.com/linux/earth/deb stable Release Hit:4 http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian unstable

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Hi Jidanni 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > # apt update > Ign:1 http://dl.google.com/linux/earth/deb stable InRelease > Hit:2 http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian experimental InRelease [...] Thanks for providing the additional requested information! Regards,

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

> "MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo > writes: MAFM> If it's a problem with packages not being available in the mirror, MAFM> perhaps you can use others temporarily, and disable other MAFM> repositories. I think Axel can reproduce it with any mirror.

Bug#799918: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#799918: apt-get proves I am innocent

2015-09-30 14:49 GMT+01:00 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson : > Manuel, can we first attack why even apt or apt-get fails? > > # apt update > Ign:1 http://dl.google.com/linux/earth/deb stable InRelease > Hit:2 http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian experimental InRelease > Hit:3