Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi again, I just now noticed that the QA information on the mentors site of my package[0] says that I have no debhelper compatibility level set and that I don't have a watch file, but both are there in the package I uploaded. I have no idea what went wrong. Also, strangely, when I downloaded the

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi again, I just now noticed that the QA information on the mentors site of my package[0] says that I have no debhelper compatibility level set and that I don't have a watch file, but both are there in the package I uploaded. I have no idea what went wrong. Also, strangely, when I downloaded the

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Am 03.11.2015 um 17:35 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > (please ping me when you fixed those, I don't look to mentors otherwise) Hi Gianfranco, I have just uploaded a new version with two patches to mentors. The git repository I use for maintaining can now also be found on github[0] (I use

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Tim Dengel wrote: > The second issue is, as you said, the use of git. But adding git to the > build dependencies would not solve this, since the .git directory is not > contained in the original tarball, so git couldn't extract the version > from it anyways. > >

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi, >Thanks! >I think what helped me the most (apart from reading lots of >documentation) was looking at existing packages in the archive. >I specifically looked at packages using the SCons build system, since >that is not natively supported by debhelper (like autotools is for example). >That

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Am 30.10.2015 um 10:13 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > well, I started packaging in 2013 and I didn't provide good packages on the > first tries. > (actually I'm still doing packaging mistakes) > > You seem to be a better packager than me, and you told you are on your first > packaging

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Tim, >Hmm, I'm not really sure what you mean with that, but alright. well, I started packaging in 2013 and I didn't provide good packages on the first tries. (actually I'm still doing packaging mistakes) You seem to be a better packager than me, and you told you are on your first

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Am 27.10.2015 um 11:53 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > Hi, > > (let me say, based on your answers I have difficulties in understanding how > possibly > your first package can be so good :) ) Hmm, I'm not really sure what you mean with that, but alright. > well, first there is a

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi, (let me say, based on your answers I have difficulties in understanding how possibly your first package can be so good :) ) >I installed into debian/package because "man dh_auto_install" told me >that "[...]the files are installed into debian/package/ if there is only >one binary package.

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Am 26.10.2015 um 19:00 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > Hi, the packaging looks good to me (note: I didn't do a full review) Hi, thanks for looking at my package! > however I don't like your dh_auto_install target override. > > dh_auto_install should install into debian/tmp, not into

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, the packaging looks good to me (note: I didn't do a full review)however I don't like your dh_auto_install target override. dh_auto_install should install into debian/tmp, not into debian/package. I propose you to use dh_install like this: override_dh_install:

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-twitch" * Package name: gnome-twitch Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Vincent Szolnoky * URL :