On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I would rather have somebody knowlegdeable first judge if really all
> combination need to be run, or if a reduced set is good enough. As I
> believe my fixup will waste needless time on the ci network.
Well, only some knowledge;
Hi Holger,
On 16-03-18 14:38, Holger Levsen wrote:
> ic, thanks for those explainations and even more for the fix-up! I've merged
> your commit now, should I upload? :)
I would rather have somebody knowlegdeable first judge if really all
combination need to be run, or if a reduced set is good
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:13:00PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I checked the first results and noticed that I send the patch from an
> intermediate git commit of mine, instead of the final one.
ah :/
> My whole discussion about large combination set was for the test suite
> with the attached
Arggg,
On 16-03-18 12:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 06:11:57AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> As an encouragement for you to upload soon with my patch (or an improved
>> one skipping lots of tests), Antonio removed the blacklisting
>> yesterday¹, which is live as
Hi Holger,
On 16-03-18 12:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 06:11:57AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> As an encouragement for you to upload soon with my patch (or an improved
>> one skipping lots of tests), Antonio removed the blacklisting
>> yesterday¹, which is live as we speak.
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 06:11:57AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> As an encouragement for you to upload soon with my patch (or an improved
> one skipping lots of tests), Antonio removed the blacklisting
> yesterday¹, which is live as we speak.
Antonio removed the blacklisting yesterday,
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:44:35 +0100 Petter Reinholdtsen
wrote:
> [Antonio Terceiro]
> > I am blacklisting debian-edu for now, and will revisit that when this
> > bug is closed.
>
> Sad to hear this.
As an encouragement for you to upload soon with my patch (or an improved
Hi,
On 15-03-18 17:06, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:44:02PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I believe the attached patch would be able to fix this bug and on top of
>> that make the test script a lot simpler and easier to understand. Please
>> verify that the script still does
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:44:02PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I believe the attached patch would be able to fix this bug and on top of
> that make the test script a lot simpler and easier to understand. Please
> verify that the script still does what is intended.
awesome, thanks a lot!
Control: tags -1 patch
On 14-03-18 10:53, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> If you want/need help to fix this bug, let me know and I'll try to have
>> a look.
>
> we surely would appreciate help fixing this bug!
I believe the attached patch would be able to fix this bug and on top of
that make the test
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 08:55:53PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Any progress on this? We are on the verge of using autopkgtest results
> for unstable-to-testing migration and missing debian-edu results seems
> just like a shame.
I'm not convinced it would be such a big loss, we have other tests on
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:46:48 -0200 Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:44:35AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Antonio Terceiro]
>>> I am blacklisting debian-edu for now, and will revisit that when
>>> this bug is closed.>>
>> Sad to hear this.
>
>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:44:35AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Antonio Terceiro]
> > Hello,
>
> Hi.
>
> > The debian-edu test suite is timing out on ci.debian.net.
>
> What is the timeout value on ci.debian.net?
The defaults for adt-run. there are different timeouts for different
Hi,
On Freitag, 27. November 2015, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The debian-edu package is a set of dynamically created metapackages that
> should be installable, and the autopkgtest scripts are verifying that
> they are indeed installable. Not all the metapackages are
> co-installable, and
Hi,
On Freitag, 27. November 2015, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Of course.
:-)
> How come? Do you mean we should drop the autopkgtest check
> and only use the jenkins test? It would work, of course, but they have
> slightly different purposes
what are the different purposes?
> I am in
[Holger Levsen]
> what are the different purposes?
The debian/tests/ scripts check installabability and desktop selection
using different mechanism from the one used by jenkins. I would say the
purpose of the autopkgtest scripts is to check that the metapackages
work as they should (ie have the
[Holger Levsen]
> you're aware of https://jenkins.debian.net/view/edu_devel/ ?
Of course. How come? Do you mean we should drop the autopkgtest check
and only use the jenkins test? It would work, of course, but they have
slightly different purposes
I am in doubt myself if it make sense to have
Hi,
On Freitag, 27. November 2015, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The debian/tests/ scripts check installabability and desktop selection
> using different mechanism from the one used by jenkins. I would say the
> purpose of the autopkgtest scripts is to check that the metapackages
> work as they
Source: debian-edu
Version: 1.812
Severity: normal
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
Hello,
The debian-edu test suite is timing out on ci.debian.net.
I noted the test suite invokes debootstrap several times, however
autopkgtest/DEP-8 is supposed to test the
[Antonio Terceiro]
> Hello,
Hi.
> The debian-edu test suite is timing out on ci.debian.net.
What is the timeout value on ci.debian.net?
> I noted the test suite invokes debootstrap several times, however
> autopkgtest/DEP-8 is supposed to test the packages as installed, and I
> don't quite
20 matches
Mail list logo