Bug#806926: Bug#766400: installation-reports: [armhf] Netgear ReadyNAS104 report

2016-12-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Hi Uwe, Can you review your old Netgear ReadyNAS 102/104 patch for flash-kernel and apply them? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Bug#806926: Bug#766400: installation-reports: [armhf] Netgear ReadyNAS104 report

2016-02-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Uwe Kleine-König [2016-02-18 20:47]: > Do we need "Bootloader-Sets-Incorrect-Root: yes"? I modified the u-boot > env to pass the right root= and rootflags= parameter. Right, that's requrired, too. > Gijs uses > > U-Boot-Initrd-Address: 0x0 > > on a rn102, but I think this is not optima

Bug#806926: Bug#766400: installation-reports: [armhf] Netgear ReadyNAS104 report

2016-02-18 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hi Martin, On 02/18/2016 08:36 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Uwe, does that look ok? Yes, the rn104 entry is what I'm using, I'm just missing the Kernel-Flavors line, which looks ok, too. Do we need "Bootloader-Sets-Incorrect-Root: yes"? I modified the u-boot env to pass the right root= and root

Bug#806926: Bug#766400: installation-reports: [armhf] Netgear ReadyNAS104 report

2016-02-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Uwe, does that look ok? diff --git a/README b/README index 1774af6..d354c87 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ The following systems are supported: - Marvell OpenRD-Client - Marvell OpenRD-Ultimate - Neo FreeRunner (GTA02) + - NETGEAR ReadyNAS 102 + - NETGEAR ReadyNAS 104 -