Bug#809228: It would be nice to have 1.60 in sid

[Steve Robbins]

Last night I got rid of these source lintian errors.  So forget my earlier msg.

I'm well on my way to an upload now.  Hopefully in the next day or two.


On February 29, 2016 9:46:55 AM CST, Mario Lang  wrote:
>"Steve M. Robbins"  writes:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 22:03:37 +0100 Mario Lang 
>wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>> 
>>>  Is there anything in particular I could help you with to get it
>>> done?
>>
>> Yes.  I have the new package in the svn and it is building.  But
>there are a 
>> zillion lintian complaints about missing sources:
>>
>> E: boost1.60 source: source-is-missing 
>> libs/sort/doc/doxygen/html/search/all_0.js line length is 258
>characters 
>> (>256)
>>
>> If you have some time to send patches for this, would be appreciated.
> I 
>
>Unfortunately, I am about to leave on a trip to Italy.
>Saturday at the earliest.
>
>> myself have no patience for this and will end up removing the doc
>package 
>> entirely to fix it.
>
>While I try to understand the motivation behind these efforts, I
>also totally understand your frustration.  These are tasks that totally
>waste our time, likely for absolutely no benefit at all.
>
>-- 
>CYa,
>  ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Bug#809228: It would be nice to have 1.60 in sid

[Mario Lang]

"Steve M. Robbins"  writes:

> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 22:03:37 +0100 Mario Lang  wrote:
>> Hi.
>> 
>>  Is there anything in particular I could help you with to get it
>> done?
>
> Yes.  I have the new package in the svn and it is building.  But there are a 
> zillion lintian complaints about missing sources:
>
> E: boost1.60 source: source-is-missing 
> libs/sort/doc/doxygen/html/search/all_0.js line length is 258 characters 
> (>256)
>
> If you have some time to send patches for this, would be appreciated.  I 

Unfortunately, I am about to leave on a trip to Italy.
Saturday at the earliest.

> myself have no patience for this and will end up removing the doc package 
> entirely to fix it.

While I try to understand the motivation behind these efforts, I
also totally understand your frustration.  These are tasks that totally
waste our time, likely for absolutely no benefit at all.

-- 
CYa,
  ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕

Bug#809228: It would be nice to have 1.60 in sid

[Steve M. Robbins]

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 22:03:37 +0100 Mario Lang  wrote:
> Hi.
> 
>  Is there anything in particular I could help you with to get it
> done?

Yes.  I have the new package in the svn and it is building.  But there are a 
zillion lintian complaints about missing sources:


E: boost1.60 source: source-is-missing 
libs/sort/doc/doxygen/html/search/all_0.js line length is 258 characters 
(>256)


If you have some time to send patches for this, would be appreciated.  I 
myself have no patience for this and will end up removing the doc package 
entirely to fix it.

-S




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#809228: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#809228: It would be nice to have 1.60 in sid

[Steve M. Robbins]

On February 26, 2016 10:03:37 PM Mario Lang wrote:
> Can you give us any sort of status when we might expect Boost 1.60 in
> sid?  Is there anything in particular I could help you with to get it
> done?

I am working on it now.  I hope to have an upload by end of week-end.

-S





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#809228: It would be nice to have 1.60 in sid

[Mario Lang]

Hi.

Can you give us any sort of status when we might expect Boost 1.60 in
sid?  Is there anything in particular I could help you with to get it
done?

-- 
CYa,
  ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature