Bug#809786: [Pkg-puppet-devel] Bug#809786: The "posix" provider of the "exec" resource seems to invoke a shell even though the documentation says it doesn't

2016-01-12 Thread Markus Frosch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04.01.2016 02:52, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > the puppet type reference describes the "posix" provider of the "exec" > resource like this: [0] > > posix Executes external binaries directly, without passing through a shell or > performing any

Bug#809786: [Pkg-puppet-devel] Bug#809786: The "posix" provider of the "exec" resource seems to invoke a shell even though the documentation says it doesn't

2016-01-12 Thread Alexander Kurtz
Control: forwarded -1 https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-5704 On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 13:28 +0100, Markus Frosch wrote: > I don't think it is. Could you please take care of the escalation and > reference that bug here? https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-5704 Best regards Alexander

Bug#809786: [Pkg-puppet-devel] Bug#809786: The "posix" provider of the "exec" resource seems to invoke a shell even though the documentation says it doesn't

2016-01-12 Thread Alexander Kurtz
Hi! > I had a look in the code lately and it seems like this part is very > much abstracted. Indeed. Before submitting this bug report, I tried to follow the function calls from the puppet/lib/puppet/provider/exec/posix.rb file, but got lost at some point. > I expect this to be the culprit: >

Bug#809786: [Pkg-puppet-devel] Bug#809786: The "posix" provider of the "exec" resource seems to invoke a shell even though the documentation says it doesn't

2016-01-12 Thread Markus Frosch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12.01.2016 13:11, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > No, I haven't, since I wasn't sure if this is Debian-specific (or maybe just > me not understanding the documentation correctly). I don't think it is. Could you please take care of the escalation and