Hi,
2016-11-04 4:42 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:45:46 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> This may be a silly / obvious question to ask, but:
>> do any of the proposed hardening options _really_ change the ABI?
>
> I don't think it's silly at
Hi!
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:45:46 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> This may be a silly / obvious question to ask, but:
> do any of the proposed hardening options _really_ change the ABI?
I don't think it's silly at all! I've actually wondered this myself
and asked Bálint in person and at
Control: forcemerge 812782 -1
Hi!
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:33:40 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.4
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: bal...@balintreczey.hu
> Usertags: hardened1-linux-amd64
> This is the second patch enabling extra flags in dpkg in case the
Hi,
This may be a silly / obvious question to ask, but:
do any of the proposed hardening options _really_ change the ABI?
I think LLVM/Clang's ASan implementation does (for Feature: "symbol size
changing for global variables" on
On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 14:07:22 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2016-03-09 12:09 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> > On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 11:29:04 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> >> 2016-03-08 1:52 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> >> > Actually setting bindnow and PIE
Hi Guillem,
2016-03-09 12:09 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 11:29:04 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2016-03-08 1:52 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
>> > Actually setting bindnow and PIE would be fine as part of the default
>> > build
Hi!
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 11:29:04 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2016-03-08 1:52 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> > Actually setting bindnow and PIE would be fine as part of the default
> > build flags from dpkg, because those do not change the ABI in
> > principle. And those are
Hi Guillem,
2016-03-08 1:52 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> Control: block -1 by 812782
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 12:55:42 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2016-01-29 0:46 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
>> > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:33:40 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
Control: block -1 by 812782
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 12:55:42 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2016-01-29 0:46 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:33:40 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> >> Package: dpkg
> >> Version: 1.18.4
> >> Severity: wishlist
> >> Tags: patch
>
Hi,
2016-01-29 0:46 GMT+01:00 Guillem Jover :
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:33:40 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.18.4
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: patch
>> User: bal...@balintreczey.hu
>> Usertags: hardened1-linux-amd64
>
>> This is the
Hi!
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:33:40 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.4
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: bal...@balintreczey.hu
> Usertags: hardened1-linux-amd64
> This is the second patch enabling extra flags in dpkg in case the
> hardened1-linux-amd64 port is
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: bal...@balintreczey.hu
Usertags: hardened1-linux-amd64
Dear Guillem,
This is the second patch enabling extra flags in dpkg in case the
hardened1-linux-amd64 port is accepted in #812782.
Cheers,
Balint
>From
12 matches
Mail list logo