Hoi Paul, On 2005â04â10 15:29:16+0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Thu 18 Nov 2004, Rob Mahurin wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:48:58PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > > > As the bug report was primarily about wanting the --partial > > > functionality, I'd like to close this bug report... > > > > If the problem I described after learning about --partial (where an > > interrupted largish update to a file turns into an enormous > > re-download) is gone, I'm satisfied. I think that my kludge was to > > concatenate the partially-updated file with the original, and try to > > update that; it worked, but required enormous amounts of disk space. > > With --partial the rsync will not re-download the already (partially) > downloaded data, so that should satisfy your demands :) > Now closing this bug report.
Not only that, but yesterday I also discovered an --inplace option, which addresses my other request. Happily rsyncing now :) cheers, -- Wessel Dankers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> âIt's union rules. There's nothing we can do about it. Sorry.â
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
