On Sun, Feb 14 2016, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> I think this is a good idea. It makes one of the two utility packages be
> installed if at least one is available (ex: Ubuntu with only Main) and
> does not error if none is available. And it prefers the better if both
> are
Le lundi, 1 février 2016, 12.00:53 Yuri D'Elia a écrit :
> On 01/02/16 11:58, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> The double recommend/suggests is a bit wonky.
> >> Maybe you should recommend on (liblouis-bin | liblouisutdml-bin).
> >>
> >> I don't know what's the difference in braille support between
>
I think this is a good idea. It makes one of the two utility packages be
installed if at least one is available (ex: Ubuntu with only Main) and
does not error if none is available. And it prefers the better if both
are available (Debian and Ubuntu with Main and Universe).
Let us go this way.
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud, on Sun 14 Feb 2016 00:06:43 +0100, wrote:
> Le lundi, 1 février 2016, 12.00:53 Yuri D'Elia a écrit :
> > On 01/02/16 11:58, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > >> The double recommend/suggests is a bit wonky.
> > >> Maybe you should recommend on (liblouis-bin | liblouisutdml-bin).
> >
Hello,
Yuri D'Elia, on Fri 29 Jan 2016 12:46:45 +0100, wrote:
> It would be nice if you could split off braille support into a separate
> package, as originally mentioned in #808057.
Again, splitting into a separate package makes it more difficult to
people to find it. People who already have a
Yuri D'Elia, on Mon 01 Feb 2016 11:50:00 +0100, wrote:
> On 01/02/16 09:14, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> On top of that, since scripts themselves can probe if louis is not
> >> available,
> >> there's no need for the dependency and fallback mechanism: just
> >> probe for liblouisutdml-bin
On 01/02/16 11:58, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> The double recommend/suggests is a bit wonky.
>> Maybe you should recommend on (liblouis-bin | liblouisutdml-bin).
>>
>> I don't know what's the difference in braille support between
>> liblouis-bin and liblouisutdml-bin, but if the package is
On 01/02/16 09:14, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> On top of that, since scripts themselves can probe if louis is not available,
>> there's no need for the dependency and fallback mechanism: just
>> probe for liblouisutdml-bin directly, or quit otherwise.
>
> We could lower the liblouis-bin dependency
Package: cups-filters
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: whishlist
This is a followup of #808057. In the previous bug, the dependency on
liblouisutdml-bin has been demoted to a suggests, but the package now depends
on liblouis-bin and liblouis-data, with still ~7mb of additional dependencies.
It would
9 matches
Mail list logo