Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-02-15 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Sun, Feb 14 2016, Till Kamppeter wrote: > I think this is a good idea. It makes one of the two utility packages be > installed if at least one is available (ex: Ubuntu with only Main) and > does not error if none is available. And it prefers the better if both > are

Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-02-13 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le lundi, 1 février 2016, 12.00:53 Yuri D'Elia a écrit : > On 01/02/16 11:58, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> The double recommend/suggests is a bit wonky. > >> Maybe you should recommend on (liblouis-bin | liblouisutdml-bin). > >> > >> I don't know what's the difference in braille support between >

Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-02-13 Thread Till Kamppeter
I think this is a good idea. It makes one of the two utility packages be installed if at least one is available (ex: Ubuntu with only Main) and does not error if none is available. And it prefers the better if both are available (Debian and Ubuntu with Main and Universe). Let us go this way.

Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-02-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud, on Sun 14 Feb 2016 00:06:43 +0100, wrote: > Le lundi, 1 février 2016, 12.00:53 Yuri D'Elia a écrit : > > On 01/02/16 11:58, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > >> The double recommend/suggests is a bit wonky. > > >> Maybe you should recommend on (liblouis-bin | liblouisutdml-bin). > >

Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-02-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Yuri D'Elia, on Fri 29 Jan 2016 12:46:45 +0100, wrote: > It would be nice if you could split off braille support into a separate > package, as originally mentioned in #808057. Again, splitting into a separate package makes it more difficult to people to find it. People who already have a

Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-02-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Yuri D'Elia, on Mon 01 Feb 2016 11:50:00 +0100, wrote: > On 01/02/16 09:14, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> On top of that, since scripts themselves can probe if louis is not > >> available, > >> there's no need for the dependency and fallback mechanism: just > >> probe for liblouisutdml-bin

Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-02-01 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On 01/02/16 11:58, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> The double recommend/suggests is a bit wonky. >> Maybe you should recommend on (liblouis-bin | liblouisutdml-bin). >> >> I don't know what's the difference in braille support between >> liblouis-bin and liblouisutdml-bin, but if the package is

Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-02-01 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On 01/02/16 09:14, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> On top of that, since scripts themselves can probe if louis is not available, >> there's no need for the dependency and fallback mechanism: just >> probe for liblouisutdml-bin directly, or quit otherwise. > > We could lower the liblouis-bin dependency

Bug#813094: Split braille support into a separate package

2016-01-29 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: cups-filters Version: 1.8.1-1 Severity: whishlist This is a followup of #808057. In the previous bug, the dependency on liblouisutdml-bin has been demoted to a suggests, but the package now depends on liblouis-bin and liblouis-data, with still ~7mb of additional dependencies. It would