Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-04-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > https://github.com/Debian/ud is the future for the ldap web interface > (db.debian.org), not for packages.debian.org, isn't it? Correct. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-04-17 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 05/04/2016 07:06, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > >> There are no commit since two years, so I'm not sure it's still alive. > > Nevertheless, it is the way forward. Perhaps I am wrong but https://github.com/Debian/ud is the future for the

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-04-05 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 05/04/2016 07:06, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > >> There are no commit since two years, so I'm not sure it's still alive. > > Nevertheless, it is the way forward. > >> I tried to extract the useful code from the script. It depends on the >>

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-04-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > There are no commit since two years, so I'm not sure it's still alive. Nevertheless, it is the way forward. > I tried to extract the useful code from the script. It depends on the > libnet-ldapapi-perl package and the configuration of

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-04-04 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 01/04/2016 06:43, Paul Wise a écrit : > DSA would very much like to kill the existing codebase behind the > db.d.o website in favour of a rewrite in django: > > https://github.com/Debian/ud There are no commit since two years, so I'm not sure it's still alive. > The existing codebase is

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-03-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > I don't know in which repository ./machines.cgi is (at least not in the > website repo). DSA would very much like to kill the existing codebase behind the db.d.o website in favour of a rewrite in django: https://github.com/Debian/ud The

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-03-31 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Le 29/03/2016 10:31, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit : > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:26:23 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: >> Some combination of >> the description, purpose, sponsor and allowedGroups LDAP fields should >> be enough to find the right hosts and display the right info. picconi >>

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-03-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:26:23 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: minor > User: www.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: packages > > The packages site says the two packages mirrors are piatti and rore but > these were decommissioned a long time

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

2016-02-19 Thread Paul Wise
Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: packages The packages site says the two packages mirrors are piatti and rore but these were decommissioned a long time ago. It would be best to generate the machines and sponsors info from Debian LDAP on a