Bug#818787: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-22 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 04:44:07PM +, Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:04:50PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > So the number of affected packages if the default HAVE_DOT is changed > > to "no" would be quite low. > > > > If, instead, doxygen is changed to depend on graphviz,

Bug#818787: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-22 Thread Bas Wijnen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:04:50PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > So the number of affected packages if the default HAVE_DOT is changed > to "no" would be quite low. > > If, instead, doxygen is changed to depend on graphviz, there would be > nothing

Bug#818787: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-21 Thread Bas Wijnen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:26:16AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Yes, so that's a bug in those programs, not in doxygen. It would be > > "fixed" by > > adding graphviz as a Depends to doxygen, but that would be incorrect. > > Please note that it

Bug#818787: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-21 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:04:24AM +, Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:07:55PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 06:51:23PM +, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > > That also means that programs calling dot will need graphviz in their > > > Build-Depends, no matter

Bug#818787: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Bas Wijnen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:07:55PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 06:51:23PM +, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > That also means that programs calling dot will need graphviz in their > > Build-Depends, no matter what the default is. >

Bug#818787: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 06:51:23PM +, Bas Wijnen wrote: > That also means that programs calling dot will need graphviz in their > Build-Depends, no matter what the default is. As is, a number of them do call dot without the build-dependency. > > But this is inconsistent with having graphviz

Bug#818787: Mass Bug Filing: Missing Build-Depends: graphviz

2016-03-20 Thread Bas Wijnen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think you are mistaken about a few things. On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 06:04:55PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > The maintainer points out that the default value for HAVE_DOT is NO, > so he's reluctant to add the build-dependency. If the program can be